Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The NMDA-receptor antagonist CPP abolishes neurogenic ‘wind-up pain’ after intrathecal administration in humans

Kristensen, Jens Dath, Svensson, Björn, Gordh, Torsten·1992·Pain

Abstract

Involvement of the NMDA receptor system in the transmission of nociceptive information, including the development of central sensitization and a wind-up phenomenon, has increased interest in NMDA-receptor antagonists as antinociceptive drugs. This case report describes the use of an NMDA receptor antagonist 3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP) in a carefully selected patient with severe and intractable neurogenic pain in her left leg. The pain syndrome had components of a continuous deep pain, an allodynia, and a wind-up-like component, including afterdischarge and spread of painful sensations outside the territory of the injured nerve. After intrathecal (i.t.) administration of 200 nmol of CPP the continuous deep pain component and allodynia were unchanged, but the following 'wind-up' phenomenon with afterdischarge and spread of the pain sensation in the left half of the body was completely abolished. Another 500 nmol of CPP administered over 2 h did not improve pain relief. Pain thresholds for heat and cold stimulation, measured with a Marstock thermostimulator, did not change. There was no effect on blood pressure, heart rate, sensitivity, reflexes, coordination or motor performance. Psychotomimetic ketamine-like side effects developed 4 h after the last injection of CPP and were probably due to rostral spread of CPP. These early experiences with i.t. administration of NMDA-receptor antagonists to humans indicate that the NMDA-receptor system plays an important role in neurogenic pain and that antagonizing this system may be a useful way to obtain better pain control although psychotomimetic side effects due to rostral spread may be a problem.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90266-e

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Kristensen, J. D., Svensson, B., & Gordh, T.
Venue
Pain
Published
1992-11
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
249-253
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067354763
Cited by
301
References
15
FWCI
12.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The NMDA-receptor antagonist CPP abolishes neurogenic ‘wind-up pain’ after intrathecal administration in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90266-e
The paper
Kristensen, J. D., Svensson, B., & Gordh, T. (1992). The NMDA-receptor antagonist CPP abolishes neurogenic ‘wind-up pain’ after intrathecal administration in humans. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(92)90266-e

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.