The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physicians' attitudes and practices regarding the long-term prescribing of opioids for non-cancer pain
Abstract
Prescribing long-term opioids for patients with chronic pain is controversial. The primary purpose of this study was to examine physicians' beliefs about and prescribing of the long-term use of opioids in the treatment of chronic pain patients. Concerns about regulatory pressure and appropriateness of education regarding opioids were also examined. The design was a stratified random sample. In the United States, 6962 physicians were randomly selected from two states in each of five regions of the country (Northeast, Midwest, Southeast, Southwest, and Pacific). Physicians from seven medical specialties (Family Practice, Internal Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rheumatology, Orthopedic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and Neurology) were surveyed and 1912 (27.46%) responded. A survey consisting of questions regarding years of practice, number of chronic pain patients treated, frequency of prescribing long-term opioids, concerns about opioids, goals of treatment, beliefs about education regarding opioids, and concerns about regulatory pressures was used. Based on the physicians who responded, it appears that prescription of long-term opioids is relatively wide-spread. Differences were noted by region, specialty, and the requirement for the use of multiple prescriptions for schedule II drugs. Physicians in the Midwestern United States were the least likely to prescribe the long-term use of opioids. Rheumatologists and general practitioners were significantly more likely to prescribe long-term opioids than were surgeons, neurologists, or physiatrists and were more likely to emphasize the importance of symptom improvement as an appropriate goal even in the absence of functional improvements.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Prescription Opioid and Heroin Crisis: A Public Health Approach to an Epidemic of Addiction
Kolodny, A., Courtwright, D. T., Hwang, C. S., Kreiner, P., Eadie, J. L., Clark, T. W., & Alexander, G. C. (2015) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122957 · Cited by 1,388
The Patient–Provider Relationship in Chronic Pain Care: Providers' Perspectives
Matthias, M. S., Parpart, A. L., Nyland, K. A., Huffman, M. A., Stubbs, D. L., Sargent, C., & Bair, M. J. (2010) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00980.x · Cited by 298
Opioid Guidelines in the Management of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain
Manchikanti, L. (2006) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2006/9/2 · Cited by 277
Substance Use Disorders in a Primary Care Sample Receiving Daily Opioid Therapy
Fleming, M. F., Balousek, S. L., Klessig, C. L., Mundt, M. P., & Brown, D. D. (2007) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2007.02.432 · Cited by 274
How good intentions contributed to bad outcomes: the opioid crisis
Rummans, T. A., Burton, M. C., & Dawson, N. L. (2018) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.12.020 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Turk, D. C., Brody, M. C., & Okifuji, A. E.
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-208
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025371839
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physicians' attitudes and practices regarding the long-term prescribing of opioids for non-cancer pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-3959(94)90072-8
- The paper
- Turk, D. C., Brody, M. C., & Okifuji, A. E. (1994). Physicians' attitudes and practices regarding the long-term prescribing of opioids for non-cancer pain. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)90072-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.