Cited by 11Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Use of melarsomine dihydrochloride (RM 340) for adulticidal treatment of dogs with naturally acquired infections of Dirofilaria immitis and for clinical prophylaxis during reexposure for 1 year

McTier, Tom L., McCall, John W., Dzimianski, Michael T., Raynaud, Jean-Pierre, Strickland, James E.·1994·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

Heartworm-infected dogs were treated therapeutically with a new heartworm adulticide (melarsomine dihydrochloride, RM 340) and then put on a Strategic Program with treatment every 4 months for clinical prophylaxis to take advantage of the drug's potent activity against 4-month-old immature as well as adult Dirofilaria immitis. Ten random-source dogs with naturally acquired heartworm infections (microfilariae- and antigen-positive) were given melarsomine (2.2 mg kg-1 twice 3 h apart) by i.m. injection in the lumbar muscles to clear their existing infections. They were then placed outdoors (August 1988) in a high-risk area in Georgia (USA) for heartworm transmission and given melarsomine at the same posology every 4 months (Strategic Program) for 12 months as a clinical prophylactic measure. Five nontreated heartworm-naive beagles placed at this site during the same period served as 'controls' to monitor heartworm transmission. After exposure for 12 months, the ten treated and five 'control' dogs were taken indoors and held for 5 months. Microfilaremia and antigenemia levels were monitored in both groups by testing at 4-5 month intervals throughout the study and the intensity of infection was determined at necropsy. Microfilaremia levels in treated dogs dropped dramatically following the initial therapeutic treatment and remained either negative or low. Only two of the five 'control' dogs became microfilaremic, and this occurred near the end of the study. Nine of the ten treated dogs were antigen-negative 4 months after the initial therapeutic treatment, and all of them were antigen-negative at all bleedings thereafter. Four of the five 'control' dogs were antigen-positive at necropsy, and only one of these was positive 4 months earlier. Based on these antigen data, the initial treatment cleared 90% of the dogs of worms, and no worms were detected in any of the treated dogs thereafter. However, it is possible that undetectable immature heartworms were present. Although all of the treated dogs were antigen-negative at necropsy, three of them had a total of eight heartworms, seven of which were clearly immature, as determined by worm length measurements, and the remaining worm was a young adult female that was probably too young to be detected. All of the five 'control' dogs had heartworms (average 7.4; range 1-16), and about half of these worms were clearly immatures. Therapeutic treatment followed by strategic treatment with melarsomine every 4 months during reexposure was at least 89.2% effective overall.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-4017(93)00643-d

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A melarsomine protocol consisting of two injections used at the University for Veterinary Medicine, Vienna in dogs with heartworm disease stages one or two shows a similar outcome compared with the literature.

    “For this reason, a melarsomine-protocol consisting of two injections (Hinney and Leschnik 2015) is used at the University for Veterinary Medicine, Vienna in dogs with heartworm disease stages one or two, showing a similar outcome compared with the literature (McTier et al. 1994; Maxwell et al. 2014; Bowman and Atkins 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McTier, T. L., McCall, J. W., Dzimianski, M. T., Raynaud, J.-P., & Strickland, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
McTier, Tom L.
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-11
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
221-233
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039741808
Cited by
11
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
heartworm disease, Dirofilaria immitis, strategic programs, microfilaremia, antigenemia, re-exposure, dogs, infection intensity, anthelmintic efficacy
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Helminth, Arsenicals, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Drug Administration Schedule, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Georgia, Male, Culicidae, Triazines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review