Cited by 27Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Retrospective study on the distribution of Dirofilaria immitis in dogs in Hungary

Bacsadi, Á., Papp, A., Szeredi, L., Tóth, G., Nemes, C., Imre, V., Tolnai, Z., Széll, Z. +1 more·2016·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

Europe has experienced the spreading of vector-borne helminths including heartworms (Dirofilaria immitis) from the Mediterranean countries towards the northern ones in the past decades. Recently, the establishment of D. immitis was confirmed in Hungary on the basis of period prevalence studies involving dogs, red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and golden jackals (Canis aureus). The aim of our retrospective study was to describe the spatial distribution of the parasite and the time course of spreading of D. immitis in Hungary. Necropsy records of 2622 dogs received at our laboratories from 2001 to 2015 were reviewed for heartworm infections. The locality of origin of animals was recorded in a geographic information system database and compared to the results of the period prevalence study involving wild canids. Autochthonous heartworm infection was detected in 27 dogs. The time course analysis indicates that the parasite established in Hungary in 2007. As temperature is one of the most important determinants of the distribution of D. immitis, the climate of the Great Hungarian Plain is the most suitable region for the establishment of D. immitis in Hungary. Our studies revealed that the Great Hungarian Plain became a D. immitis endemic region for 2015. Nevertheless, sporadic cases in wild canids and dogs also occur in other regions of the country.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.03.001

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Hungary, the first autochthonous case was detected in 2009, and studies showed low-moderate prevalence between 0.36 and 8.1%, co-infections with D. repens (3.2%), and high prevalence (51%) in Szeged.

    “In Hungary, where the first autochthonous case was detected in 2009 [109], the number of epidemiological studies has increased considerably. There are studies that showed low-moderate prevalence between 0.36 and 8.1% [110,111,112,113] and co-infections with D. repens (3.2%) [111], while a high prevalence (51%) was reported in Szeged, a city close to Serbia and Romania [114].”
  • The prevalence of D. immitis in this study (11.3%) is higher than that found in earlier serological and retrospective surveys.

    “The prevalence of D. immitis obtained in this study is higher (11.3%) than that found in earlier serological (Farkas et al. 2014) and retrospective surveys based on the necropsy records of 2622 dogs (Bacsadi et al., 2016), indicating that the number of infected dogs has been increasing in the country.”

    From The current situation of canine dirofilariosis in Hungary (2020) · cites this paper as Bacsadi et al., 2016

  • Hungary is one of the countries with the highest prevalence for dirofilariosis in Europe.

    “which is also one of the countries with the highest prevalence for dirofilariosis in Europe [26].”
  • Most of the dogs originating from Hungary in the present study were from the region of the Great Hungarian Plain, which has been considered an endemic region since 2011.

    “Most of the dogs originating from Hungary in the present study were from the region of the Great Hungarian Plain, which has been considered an endemic region since 2011 (Bacsadi et al. 2016).”
  • Since that time, examinations of dogs, red foxes, golden jackals, and one ferret revealed that D. immitis is endemic in Hungary, and the Great Hungarian Plain is hyperendemic.

    “Since that time, the examinations of dogs [120,125,126,127,128], red foxes, golden jackals (Canis aureus) [129], and one ferret (Mustela furo) [130] revealed that D. immitis is endemic in the country, and the Great Hungarian Plain is hyperendemic”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bacsadi, Á., Papp, A., Szeredi, L., Tóth, G., Nemes, C., Imre, V., Tolnai, Z., Széll, Z., & Sréter, T.
Affiliations
National Food Chain Safety Office (HU)
Corresponding author
Sréter, T.
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
220
Pages
83-86
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2297578779
Cited by
27
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, canine heartworm disease, spatial distribution, autochthonous infection, period prevalence, wild canids, red fox, golden jackal, Great Hungarian Plain, Hungary
MeSH terms
Animals, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Hungary, Retrospective Studies, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review