The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Specification and testing of some modified count data models
Open accessAbstract
This paper explores the specification and testing of some modified count data models. These alternatives permit more flexible specification of the data-generating process (dgp) than do familiar count data models (e.g., the Poisson), and provide a natural means for modeling data that are over- or underdispersed by the standards of the basic models. In the cases considered, the familiar forms of the distributions result as parameter-restricted versions of the proposed modified distributions. Accordingly, score tests of the restrictions that use only the easily-computed ML estimates of the standard models are proposed. The tests proposed by Hausman (1978) and White (1982) are also considered. The tests are then applied to count data models estimated using survey microdata on beverage consumption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Cited by
Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches
Maunder, M. N., & Punt, A. E. (2004) · Fisheries Research · doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2004.08.002 · Cited by 1,336
A great wall of patents: What is behind China's recent patent explosion?
Hu, A. G., & Jefferson, G. H. (2009) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.11.004 · Cited by 614
Do Fair Procedures Matter? The Effect of Procedural Justice on Spouse Assault
Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Brame, R., & Sherman, L. W. (1997) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3054098 · Cited by 588
ALTERNATIVE ESTIMATING AND TESTING EMPIRICAL STRATEGIES FOR FRACTIONAL REGRESSION MODELS
Ramalho, E. A., Ramalho, J. J. S., & Murteira, J. M. R. (2011) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00602.x · Cited by 448
Chang, S.-J., Chung, C.-N., & Mahmood, I. P. (2006) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0202 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Mullahy, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Econometrics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-365
- ISSN
- 0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2005903772
- Cited by
- 1,870
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Specification and testing of some modified count data models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90002-3
- The paper
- Mullahy, J. (1986). Specification and testing of some modified count data models. Journal of Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90002-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
