Cited by 60Electronic Health Records SystemsDecision Support System ApplicationsEvaluation and Performance Assessment

Experience with a structure, process and outcome framework for evaluating an information system

Cornford, T, Doukidis, Gi, Forster, D·1994·Omega

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0305-0483(94)90030-2

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cornford, T., Doukidis, G., & Forster, D.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • Athens University of Economics and Business (GR)
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
Corresponding author
Cornford, T
Venue
Omega
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-09
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
491-504
ISSN
0305-0483 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972864066
Cited by
60
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Omega (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
information system evaluation, structure-process-outcome, developing countries, health policy analysis, user perspective, health information systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review