Cited by 146Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeEvaluation and Performance AssessmentHealth Policy Implementation Science

Evaluating policy and service interventions: framework to guide selection and interpretation of study end points

Lilford, R. J., Chilton, P. J., Hemming, K., Girling, A. J., Taylor, C. A., Barach, P.·2010·BMJ

Abstract

The effect of many cost effective policy and service interventions cannot be detected at the level of the patient. This new framework could help improve the design (especially choice of primary end point) and interpretation of evaluative studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.c4413

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lilford, R. J., Chilton, P. J., Hemming, K., Girling, A. J., Taylor, C. A., & Barach, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Corresponding author
Lilford, R. J.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2010-08-27
Volume
341
Issue
aug27 1
Pages
c4413-c4413
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1996547462
Cited by
146
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 13
FWCI
19.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GR/S29874/01, EP/F063822/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
health policy evaluation, health service interventions, evaluation framework, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Bayes Theorem, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Policy, Program Evaluation, Biomarkers, Organizational Policy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Process Assessment, Health Care, Publication Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review