Cited by 40Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Evidence for axonal loss in regions occupied by senile plaques in Alzheimer cortex

Benes, F.M., Farol, P.A., Majocha, R.E., Marotta, C.A., Bird, E.D.·1991·Neuroscience

Abstract

The studies described have sought to determine what, if any, relationship exists between axons and the senile plaque, a hallmark histopathological feature of Alzheimer's disease. A double stain was performed on both early and late Alzheimer frontal cortex tissues in order to examine the interaction between axons stained with antibodies against the 200,000 mol. wt neurofilament subunit (NFP-200) of the axon cytoskeleton and Thioflavin-S, a fluorescent dye that stains plaques. Serial photomicrographs of plaques were taken and axon and plaque profiles were three-dimensionally reconstructed. Analysis of computer-processed images revealed that there were fewer axons within plaques than in regions lying one and two plaque distances away. When axons were observed passing through plaques, swelling and disruption of normal morphology was frequently present. Statistical analyses of axon counts within and around placques showed a gradient of axon density, with increased numbers occurring at progressive distances from the placque. Similar patterns were seen for early and late stages of the disease. The results of this study indicate that disruption of the axonal cytoskeleton may occur within the regions occupied by plaques.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90034-l

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The magnitude of DTI white matter alterations correlates with cognitive performance, making white matter damage a likely contributor to AD symptoms.

    “The magnitude of DTI WM alterations correlates with cognitive performance, making WM damage a likely contributor to the symptoms experienced by patients and key to understanding AD pathophysiology3.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benes, F. M., Farol, P. A., Majocha, R. E., Marotta, C. A., & Bird, E. D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • McLean Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Benes, F.M.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-01
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
651-660
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037096800
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01ag002126-11)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 02126)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH.NS 31862, MH00423)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, amyloid plaques, axonal loss, axon cytoskeleton, neurofilament subunits, thioflavin S, frontal cortex, axonal swellings, axonal disruption
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Axons, Cytoskeleton, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Fluorescent Dyes, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Thiazoles, Neurofilament Proteins, Benzothiazoles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review