Cited by 93Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Asymptotic hippocampal long-term potentiation in rats does not preclude additional potentiation at later phases

Frey, U., Schollmeier, K., Reymann, K.G., Seidenbecher, T.·1995·Neuroscience

Abstract

Hippocampal long-term potentiation may serve as an elementary process underlying certain forms of learning and memory in vertebrates. As is the case with behavioural memory, hippocampal long-term potentiation in the CA1 region and in the dentate gyrus exhibits distinct phases. These comprise a short-term early potentiation which lasts one to three hours and is independent of protein synthesis and is characterized in general by the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and protein kinases; and a later, longer lasting phase, which can be separated by inhibitors of protein synthesis. Here, we report that the prior induction of long-term potentiation, both in the dentate gyrus in vivo and in the CA1-region in vitro, precludes further long-term but not short-term potentiation by means of a newly delivered conditioning stimulus to a subset of the same activated synapse population during the early stage (approximately 1-3 hours post tetanus). In contrast, a subsequent, long-lasting potentiation can be induced after the establishment of the late phase of potentiation (> 4 h). Thus, the system preserves the capacity for short-term potentiation immediately after potentiation, but the capacity for the induction of longer lasting plastic changes is recovered only after about four hours. Our results demonstrate that, once long-term potentiation has been established, hippocampal neurons do not lose their capacity for functional plasticity during certain phases of the maintenance of long-term potentiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00117-2

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional potentiation can be induced four hours after induction of LTP1.

    “Other studies using variable stimulation intensities suggest that additional potentiation can be induced four hours after induction of LTP1 (10, 12).”

    From Synaptic evidence for the efficacy of spaced learning (2012) · cites this paper as [12]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frey, U., Schollmeier, K., Reymann, K. G., & Seidenbecher, T.
Corresponding author
Frey, U.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-08
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
799-807
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004746599
Cited by
93
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
long-term potentiation, hippocampus, CA1 region, dentate gyrus, short-term potentiation, synaptic plasticity, tetanic stimulation, protein synthesis, NMDA receptor, protein kinases, memory formation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebellar Nuclei, Electric Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Hippocampus, Male, Time Factors, Rats, Wistar, Long-Term Potentiation, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review