The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attendance and outcome in a work site weight control program: Processes and stages of change as process and predictor variables
Open accessAbstract
This naturalistic study assessed client changes during treatment and identified salient predictors of therapy attendance and outcome. Subjects were assessed on processes and stages of change, self-efficacy, social support, weight history (including expectations, goals, and reasons for losing weight), and demographics at the beginning, middle, and end of a 10-week, behaviorally oriented work site program for weight control. Significant shifts from contemplation to action occurred for clients remaining in treatment. There were also significant modifications in the use of change processes as a result of treatment: counterconditioning, contingency management, stimulus control, interpersonal control, and social liberation increased while medication use, wishful thinking, and minimizing threats decreased. Change processes employed during the early portion of the group treatment were the best predictors of treatment attendance and outcome, superior to self-efficacy, social support, weight history, and demographic variables. The results supported a transtheoretical model that emphasizes dynamic processes and stages as core dimensions for understanding how people change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change.
Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.51.3.390 · Cited by 9,098
Self-citationTranstheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change.
Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1982) · Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice · doi:10.1037/h0088437 · Cited by 3,922
Self-citationToward a Comprehensive Model of Change
Prochaska, J. O., & Diclemente, C. C. (1986) · Treating Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-2191-0_1 · Cited by 1,877
Self-citation
Cited by
In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.9.1102 · Cited by 8,596
Self-citationPredictors of dropout in weight loss interventions: a systematic review of the literature
Moroshko, I., Brennan, L., & O'Brien, P. (2011) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2011.00915.x · Cited by 497
A review of psychosocial pre‐treatment predictors of weight control
Teixeira, P. J., Going, S. B., Sardinha, L. B., & Lohman, T. G. (2005) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2005.00166.x · Cited by 449
Ryan, R. M., Lynch, M. F., Vansteenkiste, M., & Deci, E. L. (2011) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000009359313 · Cited by 429
Daughters, S. B., Lejuez, C. W., Bornovalova, M. A., Kahler, C. W., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2005) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.114.4.729 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Prochaska, J. O., Norcross, J. C., Fowler, J. L., Follick, M. J., & Abrams, D. B.
- Venue
- Addictive Behaviors
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-45
- ISSN
- 0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073699401
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
