The use of crop yield prediction as a tool for land evaluation studies in northern Australia
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Threshold models use the extreme values of diagnostic properties to determine output values.
“Threshold models use the extreme values of diagnostic properties to determine output values (Johnson et al., 1994).”
From Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Johnson et al., 1994
Cites
WOFOST: a simulation model of crop production
van Diepen, C. A., Wolf, J., van Keulen, H., et al. (1989) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.1989.tb00755.x · Cited by 790 · see citing works
Littleboy, M., Silburn, D. M., Freebairn, D. M., Woodruff, D. R., & Hammer, G. (1989) · Cited by 129 · see citing works
ALES : a framework for land evaluation using a microcomputer
Rossiter, D. G. (1990) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.1990.tb00790.x · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Soil degradation and management under intensive sugarcane cultivation in North Queensland
Wood, A. W. (1985) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.1985.tb00972.x · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Techniques of crop yield assessment for agricultural land evaluation
Dumanski, J., & Onofrei, C. (1989) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.1989.tb00754.x · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Johnson, A., & Cramb, R. (1991) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.1991.tb00881.x · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationSoil survey data needs when studying modern land use problems
Bouma, J., Lanen, H. A. J. V., Breeuwsma, A., et al. (1986) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.1986.tb00695.x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
A note on the computer simulation of crop growth in agricultural land evaluation
Varcoe, V. J. (1990) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.1990.tb00826.x · Cited by 21 · see citing works
A framework for crop growth simulation model applications
Thornton, P. K., Dent, J. B., & Bacsi, Z. (1991) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/0308-521x(91)90056-g · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Austin, M. P., Cocks, K. D., & Scientific, C. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: a review
Csikós, N., & Tóth, G. (2023) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103560 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
- Authors
- Johnson, A. K. L., Cramb, R. A., & Wegener, M. K.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Venue
- Agricultural Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-111
- ISSN
- 0308-521X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980249712
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Keywords
- crop yield prediction, land evaluation, sugarcane, soil water balance, solar radiation, land suitability, risk analysis, northern Australia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
