The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A contingency framework for management accounting systems research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organizations
Perrow, C. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091811 · Cited by 2,509
Cited by
Chenhall, R. H. (2003) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(01)00027-7 · Cited by 3,237
Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.5.583 · Cited by 2,108
An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting
Cadez, S., & Guilding, C. (2008) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.01.003 · Cited by 736
The appropriateness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory
Hartmann, F. G. H. (2000) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(98)00036-1 · Cited by 324
Brown, L. D., & Gardner, J. C. (1985) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.2307/2490908 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Waterhouse, J. H., & Tiessen, P.
- Venue
- Accounting, Organizations and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1978
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-76
- ISSN
- 0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030186290
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A contingency framework for management accounting systems research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0361-3682(78)90007-7
- The paper
- Waterhouse, J. H., & Tiessen, P. (1978). A contingency framework for management accounting systems research. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(78)90007-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
