Cited by 122Membrane-based Ion Separation TechniquesFuel Cells and Related MaterialsMembrane Separation Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sulfonated polyphosphazene ion-exchange membranes

Wycisk, Ryszard, Pintauro, Peter N.·1996·Journal of Membrane Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0376-7388(96)00146-9

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wycisk, R., & Pintauro, P. N.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Pintauro, Peter N.
Venue
Journal of Membrane Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-10
Volume
119
Issue
1
Pages
155-160
ISSN
0376-7388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984947703
Cited by
122
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Membrane Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
Keywords
ion exchange membranes, polyphosphazenes, sulfonation, degree of sulfonation, polymer degradation, ion exchange capacity, membrane swelling, N,N-dimethylacetamide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review