Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Transformation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and other staphylococcal species with plasmid DNA by electroporation

Open access
Augustin, J·1990·FEMS Microbiology Letters

Abstract

In this paper, the influence of various parameters on plasmid transformation by electroporation of Staphylococcus epidermidis Tü3298 was investigated. Cell growth conditions, various concentrations and forms of plasmid DNA, field strength, pulse duration and media for electroporation and regeneration were tested. In order to obtain optimal transformation efficiency, the cells were incubated for 30 min with DNA before pulsing. With the optimized procedure, other staphylococcal species such as S. aureus, S. staphylolyticus and S. carnosus were transformed with an efficiency up to 3 X 10(5) transformants per micrograms pC194 plasmid DNA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0378-1097(90)90283-v

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Allgaier, 1986, Eur. J. Biochem., 160, 9, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09933.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Schnell, 1988, Nature, 333, 276, 10.1038/333276a0 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Götz, 1981, J. Bacteriol., 145, 74, 10.1128/JB.145.1.74-81.1981 · DOI
  4. Götz, 1983, Mol. Gen. Genet., 189, 340, 10.1007/BF00337828 · DOI
  5. Lindberg, 1973, J. Bacteriol., 115, 139, 10.1128/JB.115.1.139-145.1973 · doi:10.1128/jb.115.1.139-145.1973
  6. Schindler, 1965, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 97, 242, 10.1016/0304-4165(65)90088-7 · DOI
  7. Schleifer, 1972, Bacteriol. Rev., 36, 407, 10.1128/br.36.4.407-477.1972 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Schleifer, 1975, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 25, 50, 10.1099/00207713-25-1-50 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Robinson, 1979, J. Bacteriol., 137, 1158, 10.1128/JB.137.3.1158-1164.1979 · DOI
  10. Neumann, 1972, J. Membrane Biol., 14, 194
  11. Neumann, 1982, EMBO J., 1, 841, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01257.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Ou-Lee, 1986, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 83, 6815
  13. Hashimoto, 1985, Microbiol. Biotech., 21, 336, 10.1007/BF00252714 · DOI
  14. Chassy, 1987, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 44, 173, 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02263.x · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02263.x · Paper page
  15. Wolf, 1989, Appl. Mikrobiol. Biotechnol., 30, 283
  16. Wirth, 1989, Mol. Gen. Genet., 216, 175, 10.1007/BF00332248 · doi:10.1007/bf00332248
  17. Horinouchi, 1982, J. Bacteriol., 150, 815, 10.1128/JB.150.2.815-825.1982 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Chang, 1978, J. Bacteriol., 134, 1141, 10.1128/JB.134.3.1141-1156.1978 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Augustin, J.
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Letters
Published
1990-01-01
Volume
66
Issue
1-3
Pages
203-207
ISSN
0378-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990222547
Cited by
193
References
0
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transformation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and other staphylococcal species with plasmid DNA by electroporation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0378-1097(90)90283-v
The paper
Augustin, J. (1990). Transformation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and other staphylococcal species with plasmid DNA by electroporation. FEMS Microbiology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1097(90)90283-v

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.