Cited by 69Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and Management

The effect of age on insulin response and glucose utilization during four hyperglycemic plateaus

Elahi, Dariush, Muller, Denis C., McAloon-Dyke, Marianne, Tobin, Jordan D., Andres, Reubin·1993·Experimental Gerontology

Abstract

In order to evaluate the potential role of insulin insensitivity as a cause of the glucose (G) intolerance of aging, we performed 230 hyperglycemic clamps, 85 on young (Y, 24 to 39 years), 47 on middle age (M, 40 to 59 years), and 98 on old (O, 60 to 90 years) carefully screened subjects of the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. The 2-h plasma G levels on an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were < 7.8 mmol/l in Y and M and < 10 mmol/l in old; the latter group was further dichotomized at 7.8 mmol/l into a "normal" group, ON, and an impaired group, OI. Four hyperglycemic plateaus were created: 3.0, 5.4, 7.9, and 12.8 mmol/l above basal. Three measures of glucose tolerance--1) G at 2 h after glucose ingestion, 2) glucose utilization, M, at each hyperglycemic plateau, and 3) glucose decay constant, K, obtained at the conclusion of each clamp--showed the best performance in the young group (Y > M = ON > OI). Despite these differences in glucose tolerance, plasma insulin responses (I) during the clamp were not significantly different except that ON < Y at the basal + 12.8 plateau (300 +/- 42 vs. 456 +/- 48 pmol/l, p < 0.01). Insulin-dependent glucose uptake, a measure of tissue sensitivity to insulin, was decreased in the old-impaired group at every plateau except the highest. We conclude that healthy, active older subjects showed moderate intolerance to oral and IV glucose and that the mechanism of this physiological aging process is most likely decreased insulin sensitivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0531-5565(93)90066-m

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elahi, D., Muller, D. C., McAloon-Dyke, M., Tobin, J. D., & Andres, R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Elahi, Dariush
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-07
Volume
28
Issue
4-5
Pages
393-409
ISSN
0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036250975
Cited by
69
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG00599, AG-00294)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
aging, insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, hyperglycemic clamp, glucose utilization, insulin response, oral glucose tolerance test, insulin sensitivity, older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Blood Glucose, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Islets of Langerhans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Time Factors, Glucose Clamp Technique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review