Cited by 576Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Could the universe have recovered from a slow first-order phase transition?

Guth, Alan H., Weinberg, Erick J.·1983·Nuclear Physics B

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0550-3213(83)90307-3

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As soon as the decay rate per unit spacetime volume Γ of the false vacuum is non-zero, the asymptotic space is not dS.

    “As soon as the decay rate per unit space time volume Γ of the false vacuum is non zero, the asymptotic space is not dS.”

    From The cosmological Higgstory of the vacuum instability (2015) · cites this paper as [72]

  • There are two critical values of the decay rate, both around H_Λ^4, where H_Λ is the Hubble rate of the would-be de Sitter region.

    “There are two critical values of the decay rate [72], both valued around H 4 Λ , with H Λ being the Hubble rate of the would-be de Sitter region.”

    From The cosmological Higgstory of the vacuum instability (2015) · cites this paper as [72]

  • When the decay rate is slower than the second critical point, bubbles do not percolate, and the asymptotic spacetime is false vacuum eternal inflation.

    “Finally, when the decay rate is even slower than the second critical point, then bubbles do not percolate, and the asymptotic spacetime is the one called 'false vacuum eternal inflation'.”

    From The cosmological Higgstory of the vacuum instability (2015) · cites this paper as [72]

  • The precise value of the second critical point is unknown, but it is bounded to be in the range 1.1 × 10^-6 ≤ Γ_1/H_Λ^4 ≤ 0.24.

    “The precise value of the second critical point is unknown, but is bounded to be in the range [72] 1.1 × 10 -6 ≤ Γ 1 /H 4 Λ ≤ 0.24.”

    From The cosmological Higgstory of the vacuum instability (2015) · cites this paper as [72]

  • If the decay rate lies between the two critical points, bubbles percolate and long chains of bubbles form, connecting arbitrarily distant points in the otherwise dS space.

    “If the decay rate lies between these two critical points, then bubbles percolate and long chains of bubbles form, connecting arbitrarily distant point in the otherwise dS space.”

    From The cosmological Higgstory of the vacuum instability (2015) · cites this paper as [72]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guth, A. H., & Weinberg, E. J.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-02
Volume
212
Issue
2
Pages
321-364
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069871288
Cited by
576
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
FWCI
26.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
first-order phase transition, bubble nucleation, quantum tunneling, bubble clusters, Higgs potential, inflation (cosmology)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review