Cited by 286Geometric and Algebraic TopologyAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Gauge theories, vertex models, and quantum groups

Witten, Edward·1990·Nuclear Physics B

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0550-3213(90)90115-t

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Witten, E.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Witten, Edward
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-01
Volume
330
Issue
2-3
Pages
285-346
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968829869
Cited by
278
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 30 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
42.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
Jones polynomial, vertex model, quantum groups, Chern-Simons theory, gauge theory, knot invariants, integrable systems, statistical mechanics, duality, three-dimensional gauge theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review