The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liouville models of black hole evaporation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract A renormalizable two-dimensional quantum field theory, containing a metric, a dilaton and N massless scalar matter fields, has been proposed as a model for black hole evaporation reflecting the conformal anomaly. Previous work on this model has been done in the large- N (weak coupling) approximation and clear evidence for Hawking radiation and its back-reaction on the metric has been seen. There are, however, quantum consistency questions since the original model was only designed to be a c = 26 conformal field theory in the weak coupling limit. In this paper we construct new theories, differing from the old only in the dilaton dependence of the cosmological constant and reducing to it in the weak coupling limit. They are exact c = 26 conformal field theories and presumably consistent frameworks for discussing this problem. We also study the new theories with a change in the Polyakov action proposed by Strominger with a view to eliminating unphysical ghost Hawking radiation. The classical equations of motion of the new theories are explicitly soluble, thus permitting an exact analysis of both static solutions and dynamic scenarios. While the static solutions are, by and large, physically reasonable, the dynamical solutions include puzzling examples where wrong-sign Hawking radiation is stimulated by allowing matter to fall into a static solution. We indicate how the latter problem may be resolved in the full quantum theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Endpoint of Hawking Evaporation
Russo, J., Susskind, L., & Thorlacius, L. (1992) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.hep-th/9206070 · Cited by 342
Are horned particles the end point of Hawking evaporation?
Banks, T., Dabholkar, A., Douglas, M. R., & O'Loughlin, M. (1992) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.45.3607 · Cited by 191
Cited by
The stretched horizon and black hole complementarity
Susskind, L., Thorlacius, L., & Uglum, J. (1993) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.48.3743 · Cited by 1,081
Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography
Almheiri, A., & Polchinski, J. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2015)014 · Cited by 678
Black hole thermodynamics and information loss in two dimensions
Fiola, T. M., Preskill, J., Strominger, A., & Trivedi, S. P. (1994) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.3987 · Cited by 242
Islands in Asymptotically Flat 2D Gravity
Hartman, T., Shaghoulian, E., & Strominger, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.13857 · Cited by 147
“7) describes a soluble, null variant of Liouville theory [13,16], but it it has no singularities and no black holes.”
BackgroundNumerical analysis of black hole evaporation
Piran, T., & Strominger, A. (1993) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.48.4729 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Bilal, A., & Callan, C.
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 394
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-98
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047185722
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liouville models of black hole evaporation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0550-3213(93)90102-u
- The paper
- Bilal, A., & Callan, C. (1993). Liouville models of black hole evaporation. Nuclear Physics B. https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(93)90102-u
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.