CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 147Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum chaos and dynamical systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.

Islands in Asymptotically Flat 2D Gravity

Open access
Hartman, Thomas, Shaghoulian, Edgar, Strominger, Andrew·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2004.13857arXiv 2004.13857
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The large-N limit of asymptotically flat two-dimensional dilaton gravity coupled to N free matter fields provides a useful toy model for semiclassical black holes and the information paradox. Analyses of the asymptotic information flux as given by the entanglement entropy show that it follows the Hawking curve, indicating that information is destroyed in these models. Recently, motivated by developments in AdS/CFT, a semiclassical island rule for entropy has been proposed. We define and compute the island rule entropy for black hole formation and evaporation in the large-N RST model of dilaton gravity and show that, in contrast, it follows the unitary Page curve. The relation of these two observations, and interesting properties of the dilaton gravity island rule, are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2004.13857

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The minimum of the disconnected and completely connected topologies dominates the path integral and gives the unitary Page curve.

    “The minimum of the two dominates the path integral and gives the unitary Page curve, see [70,71] (see also [24,84]).”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [84]

    Section 3.3 (Page curve; page not supplied) takes the minimum of the no-island and island entropies and obtains a curve that rises and then falls to zero. But Appendix A (Local analysis of replica wormholes; page not supplied) says the authors do not construct the wormhole saddles globally and do not give a complete path-integral derivation. The claim that the minimum of disconnected and completely connected topologies dominates the path integral therefore goes beyond what this paper establishes. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 40 · Cited by 147

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2752 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. G. Penington, Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox, arXiv:1905.08255 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  3. A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, JHEP 12 (2019) 063 [arXiv:1905.08762] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  4. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry, JHEP 03 (2020) 149 [arXiv:1908.10996] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  5. A. Almheiri et al., Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation, JHEP 05 (2020) 013 [arXiv:1911.12333] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, arXiv:1911.11977 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  7. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  8. T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1307.2892] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  9. V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  10. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum extremal surfaces: holographic entanglement entropy beyond the classical regime, JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1408.3203] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  11. A. Strominger, Les houches lectures on black holes, in the proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute: Les Houches Summer School, Session 62: Fluctuating Geometries in Statistical Mechanics and Field Theory, August 2-September 9, Les Houches, France (1994), hep-th/9501071 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  12. C.G. Callan Jr., S.B. Giddings, J.A. Harvey and A. Strominger, Evanescent black holes, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 1005 [hep-th/9111056] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  13. A. Bilal and C.G. Callan Jr., Liouville models of black hole evaporation, Nucl. Phys. B 394 (1993) 73 [hep-th/9205089] [INSPIRE]. JHEP07(2020)022 · DOI
  14. J.G. Russo, L. Susskind and L. Thorlacius, The endpoint of Hawking radiation, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 3444 [hep-th/9206070] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  15. S.B. Giddings and A. Strominger, Quantum theories of dilaton gravity, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 2454 [hep-th/9207034] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  16. S.P. de Alwis, Quantum black holes in two-dimensions, hep-th/9207095 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  17. J.L. Karczmarek, J.M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, Black hole non-formation in the matrix model, JHEP 01 (2006) 039 [hep-th/0411174] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  18. S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 3339 [cond-mat/9212030] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  19. J.M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, Semiclassical decay of near extremal five-branes, JHEP 12 (1997) 008 [hep-th/9710014] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  20. O. Aharony, M. Berkooz, D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg, Linear dilatons, NS five-branes and holography, JHEP 10 (1998) 004 [hep-th/9808149] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Y. Zhao, A quantum circuit interpretation of evaporating black hole geometry, arXiv:1912.00909 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  22. C. Akers, N. Engelhardt and D. Harlow, Simple holographic models of black hole evaporation, arXiv:1910.00972 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  23. M. Rozali et al., Information radiation in BCFT models of black holes, JHEP 05 (2020) 004 [arXiv:1910.12836] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  24. H.Z. Chen, Z. Fisher, J. Hernandez, R.C. Myers and S.-M. Ruan, Information flow in black hole evaporation, JHEP 03 (2020) 152 [arXiv:1911.03402] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  25. R. Bousso and M. Tomašević, Unitarity from a smooth horizon?, arXiv:1911.06305 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  26. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J.E. Santos, Entanglement islands in higher dimensions, SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 001 [arXiv:1911.09666] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  27. Y. Chen, Pulling out the island with modular flow, JHEP 03 (2020) 033 [arXiv:1912.02210] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  28. A. Laddha, S.G. Prabhu, S. Raju and P. Shrivastava, The holographic nature of null infinity, arXiv:2002.02448 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  29. A. Mousatov and E. Silverstein, Recovering infalling information via string spreading, arXiv:2002.12377 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  30. I. Kim, E. Tang and J. Preskill, The ghost in the radiation: robust encodings of the black hole interior, JHEP 06 (2020) 031 [arXiv:2003.05451] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  31. K. Saraswat and N. Afshordi, Extracting Hawking radiation near the horizon of AdS black holes, arXiv:2003.12676 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  32. Y. Chen, X.-L. Qi and P. Zhang, Replica wormhole and information retrieval in the SYK model coupled to Majorana chains, JHEP 06 (2020) 121 [arXiv:2003.13147] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  33. D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes and the order and disorder of black hole information, arXiv:2002.08950 [INSPIRE]. JHEP07(2020)022 · arXiv
  34. H. Verlinde, ER = EPR revisited: on the entropy of an Einstein-Rosen bridge, arXiv:2003.13117 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  35. C. Jana, R. Loganayagam and M. Rangamani, Open quantum systems and Schwinger-Keldysh holograms, arXiv:2004.02888 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  36. S.B. Giddings and G.J. Turiaci, Wormhole calculus, replicas and entropies, arXiv:2004.02900 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  37. H. Liu and S. Vardhan, A dynamical mechanism for the Page curve from quantum chaos, arXiv:2002.05734 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  38. J. Pollack, M. Rozali, J. Sully and D. Wakeham, Eigenstate thermalization and disorder averaging in gravity, arXiv:2002.02971 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  39. V. Balasubramanian et al., Geometric secret sharing in a model of Hawking radiation, arXiv:2003.05448 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  40. F.F. Gautason, L. Schneiderbauer, W. Sybesma and L. Thorlacius, Page curve for an evaporating black hole, JHEP 05 (2020) 091 [arXiv:2004.00598] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  41. T. Anegawa and N. Iizuka, Notes on islands in asymptotically flat 2d dilaton black holes, arXiv:2004.01601 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  42. T.M. Fiola, J. Preskill, A. Strominger and S.P. Trivedi, Black hole thermodynamics and information loss in two-dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 3987 [hep-th/9403137] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  43. G. Mandal, A.M. Sengupta and S.R. Wadia, Classical solutions of two-dimensional string theory, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 (1991) 1685 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  44. E. Witten, On string theory and black holes, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 314 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  45. T. Piran and A. Strominger, Numerical analysis of black hole evaporation, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 4729 [hep-th/9304148] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  46. A. Strominger and L. Thorlacius, Conformally invariant boundary conditions for dilaton gravity, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 5177 [hep-th/9405084] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  47. J. Polchinski and A. Strominger, A possible resolution of the black hole information puzzle, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7403 [hep-th/9407008] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  48. P. Calabrese, J. Cardy and E. Tonni, Entanglement entropy of two disjoint intervals in conformal field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 0911 (2009) P11001 [arXiv:0905.2069] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  49. P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 504005 [arXiv:0905.4013] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  50. D.N. Page, Information in black hole radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306083] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  51. D.N. Page, Time dependence of Hawking radiation entropy, JCAP 09 (2013) 028 [arXiv:1301.4995] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  52. P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems, JHEP 09 (2007) 120 [arXiv:0708.4025] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  53. Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast scramblers, JHEP 10 (2008) 065 [arXiv:0808.2096] [INSPIRE]. JHEP07(2020)022 · DOI · Paper page
  54. S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Black holes and the butterfly effect, JHEP 03 (2014) 067 [arXiv:1306.0622] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  55. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. Maldacena, Islands outside the horizon, arXiv:1910.11077 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  56. A. Strominger and S.P. Trivedi, Information consumption by Reissner-Nordstrom black holes, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 5778 [hep-th/9302080] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  57. A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1304.4926] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  58. X. Dong and A. Lewkowycz, Entropy, extremality, euclidean variations and the equations of motion, JHEP 01 (2018) 081 [arXiv:1705.08453] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  59. X. Dong, A. Lewkowycz and M. Rangamani, Deriving covariant holographic entanglement, JHEP 11 (2016) 028 [arXiv:1607.07506] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  60. C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek, Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 424 (1994) 443 [hep-th/9403108] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  61. P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 0406 (2004) P06002 [hep-th/0405152] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  62. R.C. Myers, Black hole entropy in two-dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 6412 [hep-th/9405162] [INSPIRE]. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Hartman, T., Shaghoulian, E., & Strominger, A.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Shaghoulian, Edgar
ORCID
Shaghoulian, Edgar
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
2020
Issue
7
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2004.13857
arXiv
2004.13857
OpenAlex
W3020866317
Cited by
147
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 11
FWCI
11.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (0007870, DESC0014123, DESC0007870)
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Keywords
dilaton gravity, island rule, Page curve, entanglement entropy, black hole information paradox, semiclassical black holes, large N limit, black hole evaporation, black hole formation, AdS/CFT correspondence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review