The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cosmic p-branes
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The theory has black brane solutions with the necessary properties.
“The theory does have black brane solutions with the necessary properties [14,15].”
From Transdimensional tunneling in the multiverse (2010) · cites this paper as [15]
Section 5 (General Charged Branes; page unavailable) gives metrics for charged p-branes and describes the solutions as boost-symmetric, supporting the existence of brane solutions. But the claim does not specify the “necessary properties”; the paper also says its solutions suffer from singularities and leaves their stability unresolved. Our copy therefore cannot establish that they have all the properties the citing authors require. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredUsing results of [15] and [14], it can be shown that (46) is the only solution which is both non-singular and boost-invariant.
“Using the results of Refs.[15] and [14], it can be shown that ( 46) is the only solution which is both non-singular and boost-invariant.”
From Transdimensional tunneling in the multiverse (2010) · cites this paper as [15]
Section 5, “General Charged Branes” (page unavailable), identifies boost-symmetric solutions, but does not establish that any particular solution is uniquely both boost-invariant and non-singular. The Discussion (page unavailable) says the exact solutions generically have naked singularities at the brane core and proposes that a defect core might smooth them out. The cited paper therefore supports the boost-symmetry aspect, not the claimed non-singularity or uniqueness of equation (46). (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEinstein-Maxwell theory with Λ6=0 has magnetically charged, asymptotically flat black brane solutions.
“It is well known that Einstein-Maxwell theory with Λ 6 = 0 has magnetically charged, asymptotically flat black brane solutions [14,15].”
From Transdimensional tunneling in the multiverse (2010) · cites this paper as [15]
Section 4 (page unavailable) imposes asymptotically Minkowskian boundary conditions, and Section 5 derives magnetically charged p-brane solutions with unrestricted dilaton coupling. But Section 6 says the paper’s solutions have a singularity at r+ rather than inside an event horizon, so they do not establish the claimed black-brane solutions. The cited passages also do not state the Λ6=0 condition explicitly. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Gibbons, 1988, Nucl. Phys. B, 298, 741, 10.1016/0550-3213(88)90006-5 · DOI
- Horowitz, 1991, Nucl. Phys. B, 360, 197, 10.1016/0550-3213(91)90440-9 · DOI
- Gregory, 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 2837, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2837 · DOI · Paper page
- Gregory, 1994, Nucl. Phys. B, 428, 399, 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90206-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Gregory, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 305, 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.R305 · DOI
- Hindmarsh, 1995, Rep. Prog. Phys., 58, 477, 10.1088/0034-4885/58/5/001 · DOI
- R.H. Brandenberger, Modern cosmology and structure formation, astro-ph/9412049. · arXiv
- Hawking, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 3382, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3382 · DOI
- Emparan, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 3386, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3386 · DOI
- Eardley, 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 3390, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3390 · DOI
- Gregory, 1995, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 5598, 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.5598 · DOI
- Bogomolnyi, 1976, Yad. Fz., 24, 861
- Bogomolnyi, 1976, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys., 24, 449
- Kinnersley, 1970, Phys. Rev. D, 2, 1359, 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1359 · DOI
- Garfinkle, 1985, Phys. Rev. D, 32, 1323, 10.1103/PhysRevD.32.1323 · DOI
- Gregory, 1987, Phys. Rev. Lett., 59, 740, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.740 · DOI
- Skyrme, 1961, 260, 127
- Bizon, 1992, Phys. Lett. B, 297, 55, 10.1016/0370-2693(92)91069-L · DOI
- Brans, 1961, Phys. Rev., 124, 925, 10.1103/PhysRev.124.925 · DOI · Paper page
- Brans, 1962, Phys. Rev., 125, 2194, 10.1103/PhysRev.125.2194 · DOI
- S. Kalyana-Rama, Singularities in low energy D = 4 heterotic string and Brans-Dicke theories, hep-th/9309046. · arXiv
- Reasenberg, 1979, Astrophys. J., 234, L219, 10.1086/183144 · DOI
- Duff, 1995, Phys. Rep., 259, 213, 10.1016/0370-1573(95)00002-X · DOI
- Garfinkle, 1991, Phys. Rev. D, 43, 3140, 10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3140 · DOI
- Ortiz, 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 45, 2586, 10.1103/PhysRevD.45.R2586 · DOI
- Lee, 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 45, 2751, 10.1103/PhysRevD.45.2751 · DOI
- Duff, 1994, Nucl. Phys. B, 416, 301, 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90586-X · DOI
- Dabholkar, 1989, Phys. Rev. Lett., 63, 719, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.478 · DOI
- Tseytlin, 1995, Phys. Lett. B, 363, 223, 10.1016/0370-2693(95)01228-7 · DOI
- Martinec, 1995, Class. Quant. Grav., 12, 941, 10.1088/0264-9381/12/4/005 · DOI
- Witten, 1982, Nucl. Phys. B, 195, 481, 10.1016/0550-3213(82)90007-4 · DOI · Paper page
- F. Dowker, J.P. Gauntlett, G.W. Gibbons and G.T. Horowitz, The decay of magnetic fields in Kaluza-Klein theory, hep-th/9507143. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transdimensional tunneling in the multiverse
Blanco-Pillado, J. J., Schwartz-Perlov, D., & Vilenkin, A. (2010) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/05/005 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Gregory, R.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gregory, Ruth
- ORCID
- Gregory, Ruth
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 467
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 159-182
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2037498162
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- cosmic strings, p-branes, Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravity, boost symmetry, naked singularities, Kaluza-Klein reduction, higher-dimensional spacetime, brane solutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
