The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Project Team Communication and Cross‐Functional Cooperation in New Program Development
Abstract
The importance of communication for the successful development of new projects, particularly within the R&D laboratory setting, has been well documented. Yet researchers have seldom examined the relationship between patterns of communication and cross-functional cooperation in the development and management of new programs. In this article Mary Beth and Jeffrey Pinto report on the results of a research study that assessed the relationship of two aspects of project team communication (formal versus informal modes and reason for communication) with the level of cross-functional cooperation actually achieved within a hospital project team charged with developing a new program. A total of 262 team members were surveyed from 72 hospital project teams. The results demonstrated that high cooperation teams differed from low cooperation teams both in terms of their increased use of informal methods for communication as well as their reasons for communicating. Finally, cross-functional cooperation was found to be a strong predictor of certain project outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations
Ven, A. H. V. D., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094477 · Cited by 1,979
Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information
Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(83)90156-3 · Cited by 1,309
Cited by
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635 · Cited by 1,671
Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital
Gargiulo, M., & Benassi, M. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.2.183.12514 · Cited by 1,511
An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment
Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Salam, A. F. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.010 · Cited by 922
What Do We Know about Health Care Team Effectiveness? A Review of the Literature
Lemieux-Charles, L., & McGuire, W. L. (2006) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558706287003 · Cited by 844
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinto, M. B., & Pinto, J. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-09-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 200-212
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063702079
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Project Team Communication and Cross‐Functional Cooperation in New Program Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0737-6782(90)90004-x
- The paper
- Pinto, M. B., & Pinto, J. K. (1990). Project Team Communication and Cross‐Functional Cooperation in New Program Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(90)90004-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
