Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools

Kulik, James A., Kulik, Chen-Lin C., Bangert-Drowns, Robert L.·1985·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/0747-5632(85)90007-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0747-5632(85)90007-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Akkerhuis, 1974, A comparison of pupil achievement and pupil attitudes with and without the assistance of batch computer-supported instruction, Dissertation Abstracts International, 4, 6345A
  2. Bangert, 1983, Individualized systems of instruction in secondary schools, Review of Educational Research, 53, 143, 10.3102/00346543053002143 · DOI
  3. Burns, 1981, A quantitative synthesis of research findings relative to the pedagogical effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in elementary and secondary schools, Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 2946A
  4. Cranford, 1976, A study of the effects of computer assisted instruction in mathematics on the achievement and attitude of pupils in grades five and six in a rural setting, Dissertation Abstracts International, 37, 5660A
  5. Davies, 1972, An evaluation of computer assisted instruction using a drill and practice program, Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 6970B
  6. Delon, 1970, A field test of computer assisted instruction in first grade mathematics, Educational Leadership, 28, 170
  7. Easterling, 1982, The effects of computer assisted instruction as a supplement to classroom instruction in reading comprehension and arithmetic, Dissertation Abstract International, 43, 2231A
  8. Edwards, 1975, How effective is CAI? A review of the research, Educational Leadership, 33, 147
  9. Fejfar, 1969, ISU lab school fourth graders learn through CAI, Contemporary Education, 40, 296
  10. Fletcher, 1972, Evaluation of the Stanford CAI program in initial reading, Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 597, 10.1037/h0034065 · doi:10.1037/h0034065
  11. Haberman, 1977, Effectiveness of computer assisted instruction with socially/emotionally disturbed children, Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 1998A
  12. Hartley, 1978, Meta-analysis of the effects of individually paced instruction in mathematics, Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 4003
  13. Hedges, 1980, Vote counting methods in research synthesis, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 359, 10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.359 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Kulik, 1983, Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students, Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 19, 10.1037/0022-0663.75.1.19 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.75.1.19 · Paper page
  15. Kulik, 1979, A meta-analysis of outcome studies of Keller's personalized System of Instruction, American Psychologist, 34, 307, 10.1037/0003-066X.34.4.307 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.4.307 · Paper page
  16. Litman, 1977, Relation between computer-assisted instruction and reading achievement among fourth, fifth, and sixth grade students, Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 2003A
  17. MacLean, 1974, A comparison of three methods of presenting instruction in introductory multiplication to elementary school children (total computer, partial computer, and non-computer, Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 1430
  18. Mendelsohn, 1972, CAI in New York City: The slow learner in mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Yearbook, 355
  19. Miller, 1984, A comparison of computer-assisted instruction with prescription learning and the traditional “pull-out” program used in supplementing of mathematics basic skills to Chapter I (Title I) students, Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 2397A
  20. Nabors, 1974, A comparative study of academic achievement and problem-solving abilities of black pupils at the intermediate level in computer-supported instruction and self-contained instructional programs, Dissertation Abstracts International, 36, 3241A
  21. Ragosta, 1983, Computer-assisted instruction and compensatory education: A longitudinal analysis, Machine-Mediated Learning, 1, 97
  22. Roberts, 1982, The effects of split-day scheduling and computer-managed instruction on the reading achievement of intermediate students, Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 1482A
  23. Suppes, 1969, Computer-assisted instruction, Science, 166, 343, 10.1126/science.166.3903.343 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Thompson, 1973, Effect of computer-assisted instruction on the language arts achievement of elementary school children, Dissertation Abstracts International, 33, 4077
  25. Vinsonhaler, 1972, A summary of ten major studies on CAI drill and practice, Educational Technology, 12, 29
  26. Wilson, 1970, Practice and perfection: A preliminary analysis of achievement data from the CAI elementary English program, Elementary English, 47, 576

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C.-L. C., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
59-74
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0747-5632(85)90007-x
OpenAlex
W3037177567
Cited by
252
References
1
FWCI
77.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0747-5632(85)90007-x
The paper
Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C.-L. C., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(85)90007-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.