Cited by 213Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Accessing interlexical homographs: some limitations of a language-selective access

Beauvillain, Cécile, Grainger, Jonathan·1987·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0749-596x(87)90108-2

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beauvillain, C., & Grainger, J.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Beauvillain, Cécile
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-12
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
658-672
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112859643
Cited by
213
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 19
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
bilingual word recognition, reading frequency, French-English bilinguals, visual word processing, lexical ambiguity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review