The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension
Open accessAbstract
We investigated the accessibility of information from situation models during narrative comprehension. Subjects memorized a diagram of a building and then read narratives describing a person moving through the building in order to achieve a goal. To probe accessibility, we periodically interrupted the narrative by presenting the names of two objects, and subjects decided whether the objects were located in the same or different rooms of the building. Experiment 1 investigated objects' accessibility after goal sentences (e.g., Wilbur walked from the storage area into the wash room). Objects from the goal room, where the character was located, were most accessible. Furthermore, accessibility of the objects tended to decrease as the distance from the location room to the probed room increased, suggesting that the situation model preserves some information about distance. Experiment 2 indicated that accessibility depended on the location of the protagonist in the situation model rather than recency of mention of the rooms in the text. Finally, Experiment 3 showed that after path sentences, where the character is on the path heading toward the goal (e.g., While Wilbur was walking through the storage area toward the wash room, he looked at the loading dock), both the path and goal rooms are highly accessible. This finding reflects the fact that the two rooms are relevant to the incomplete motion event. Thus, information accessibility depends more on the described situations than on the surface organization of the narrative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407 · Cited by 8,141
Cited by
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149 · Cited by 6,887
Situation models in language comprehension and memory
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162 · Cited by 2,877
Segmentation in the perception and memory of events
Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.11.004 · Cited by 776
Do readers mentally represent characters' emotional states?
Gernsbacher, M. A., Goldsmith, H. H., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1992) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939208411061 · Cited by 334
Registered Replication Report: Schooler and Engstler-Schooler (1990)
Alogna, V. K., Attaya, M. K., Aucoin, P., Bahník, Š., Birch, S., Birt, A. R., Bornstein, B. H., Bouwmeester, S., Brandimonte, M. A., Brown, C., et al. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614545653 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-187
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057308153
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 118.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0749-596x(87)90122-7
- The paper
- Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(87)90122-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.