Cited by 288Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology ResearchLanguage Development and Disorders

Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances

Ferreira, Fernanda·1991·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0749-596x(91)90004-4

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preparing a simple sentence can easily require a second or more.

    “preparing a simple sentence can easily require a second or more”

    From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Ferreira, 1991

  • Utterance planning is not instantaneous but requires substantial amounts of time.

    “This is remarkable because utterance planning is not instantaneous but requires substantial amounts of time.”

    From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Ferreira, 1991

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferreira, F.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Ferreira, Fernanda
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
210-233
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974576139
Cited by
288
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • National Institutes of Health (HD-18708)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
sentence length, syntactic complexity, pause duration, phrase structure trees, semantic plausibility, speech production, syntactic prominence, sentence segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review