Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Thompson and Loewenstein (1992), management estimates of a fair settlement were significantly lower than those provided by the union, and there was a significant positive correlation between the difference in assessments of fairness and the length of strikes.
“In an experimental study of labormanagement negotiations, Thompson and Loewenstein (1992) found that management estimates of a fair settlement were significantly lower than those provided by the union and observed a significant positive correlation between the difference in assessments of fairness and the length of strikes.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Thompson and Loewenstein (1992)
In Thompson and Loewenstein (1992), complexity of information had a small but significant effect in increasing the discrepancy between union and management's self-serving perceptions of the fair wage.
“They also manipulated the complexity of information provided to the two sides and found that complexity had a small but significant effect in increasing the discrepancy between the union and management's self-serving perceptions of the fair wage.”
From Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases (1997) · cites this paper as Thompson and Loewenstein (1992)
Cites
Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057880 · Cited by 882 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It is well known that prior beliefs and knowledge influence the way that information is processed and encoded (Hastorf & Cantril, 1954; Cohen, 1981; Ross & Lepper, 1980).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_07 · Cited by 2,118 · see citing works
Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.547 · Cited by 1,167 · see citing works
Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases
Babcock, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1997) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.11.1.109 · Cited by 1,071 · see citing works
Self-citationMisperceptions in Intergroup Conflict: Disagreeing About What We Disagree About
Chambers, J. R., Baron, R. S., & Inman, M. L. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01662.x · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Steinbeis, N., Bernhardt, B. C., & Singer, T. (2015) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsu057 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thompson, L., & Loewenstein, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thompson, Leigh
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-03
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 176-197
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075963991
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 32.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Keywords
- egocentric bias, fairness judgments, interpersonal conflict, bargaining, settlement delay, strikes, conflict resolution, inequity aversion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
