Syndicated investments by venture capital firms: A networking perspective
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Coinvestment between venture capital firms in entrepreneurial businesses is beneficial for venture capitalists and provides better quality and larger funds for entrepreneurial businesses.
“Coinvestment between venture capital firms in entrepreneurial businesses has been shown to be both beneficial for venture capitalists and provides better quality and larger funds for entrepreneurial businesses (Bygrave, 1987;1988).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Bygrave, 1987
If the investment infrastructure (venture finance networks) is weak, it may lead to the failure of new technologies or practices, an inability to enter markets, and the premature failure of entrepreneurial firms.
“If the investment infrastructure (venture finance networks) is weak it may lead to the failure of new technologies or practices, an inability to enter markets, and the premature failure of entrepreneurial firms (Harrison and Mason, 1996;Bygrave, 1987;1988).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Bygrave, 1987
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bygrave, W. D.
- Affiliations
- Babson College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bygrave, William D.
- Venue
- Journal of Business Venturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-154
- ISSN
- 0883-9026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983987175
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Business Venturing (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Private Equity and Venture Capital
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- venture capital, co-investment, information sharing, investment uncertainty, industrial specialization, financial risk sharing, network centrality, network diameter
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
