Cited by 1,174Categorization, perception, and languageLanguage Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning Development

The importance of shape in early lexical learning

Landau, Barbara, Smith, Linda B., Jones, Susan S.·1988·Cognitive Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0885-2014(88)90014-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Indiana University (US)
Corresponding author
Landau, Barbara
Venue
Cognitive Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-07
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
299-321
ISSN
0885-2014 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982374456
Cited by
1,174
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 60
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
shape bias, vocabulary acquisition, word extension, perceptual similarity, perceptual categorization, count nouns, texture, size, language acquisition, early childhood, developmental changes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review