Cited by 2,817Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceMachine Learning and Algorithms

Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction

Lake, Brenden M., Salakhutdinov, Ruslan, Tenenbaum, Joshua B.·2015·Science

Abstract

Handwritten characters drawn by a model: Not only do children learn effortlessly, they do so quickly and with a remarkable ability to use what they have learned as the raw material for creating new stuff. Lake et al. describe a computational model that learns in a similar fashion and does so better than current deep learning algorithms. The model classifies, parses, and recreates handwritten characters, and can generate new letters of the alphabet that look “right” as judged by Turing-like tests of the model's output in comparison to what real humans produce. Science , this issue p. 1332

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aab3050

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Object detection algorithms are unable, in general, to recognize object categories outside of their training dataset.

    “Object detection algorithms are unable, in general, to recognize object categories outside of their training dataset, although ideally there should be the ability to recognize novel object categories (Lake et al. 2015;Hariharan and Girshick 2017).”

    From Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey (2020) · cites this paper as Lake et al. 2015

  • Humans (even children) can learn a visual concept quickly from very few given examples and can often generalize well.

    “In contrast, humans (even children) can learn a visual concept quickly from very few given examples and can often generalize well (Biederman 1987b;Lake et al. 2015;FeiFei et al. 2006).”

    From Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey (2020) · cites this paper as Lake et al. 2015

  • Higher-level systems in the brain may be able to implement Bayesian learning of sequential programs, which is a powerful means of one-shot learning.

    “Finally, higher-level systems in the brain may be able to implement Bayesian learning of sequential programs, which is a powerful means of one-shot learning (Lake et al., 2015).”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Lake et al., 2015

  • Sequential programs enable one-shot learning of new geometric/visual concepts.

    “In particular, sequential programs were found to enable one-shot learning of new geometric/visual concepts (Lake et al., 2015).”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Lake et al., 2015

  • Structured, serial, hierarchical probabilistic programs have recently been shown to model aspects of human conceptual representation and compositional learning.

    “Structured, serial, hierarchical probabilistic programs have recently been shown to model aspects of human conceptual representation and compositional learning (Lake et al., 2015).”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Lake et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Lake, Brenden M.
Venue
Science
Published
2015-12-11
Volume
350
Issue
6266
Pages
1332-1338
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2194321275
Cited by
2,817
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 137 · 2025: 186 · 2024: 256 · 2023: 281 · 2022: 300 · 2021: 415 · 2020: 400 · 2019: 393 · 2018: 223 · 2017: 145 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 1
FWCI
146.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Naval Research (W911NF-08-1-0242, W911NF-13-1-2012, N000141310333)
  • Army Research Office
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • NSF Science and Technology Center (CCF-1231216)
  • Moore-Sloan Data Science Environment at NYU
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
concept learning, one-shot classification, handwritten character recognition, alphabet, visual concepts, visual Turing test
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Computer Simulation, Concept Formation, Generalization, Psychological, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review