The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controversies in the long-term management of analgesic therapy in patients with advanced cancer
Open accessAbstract
The management of pain in the patient with advanced cancer requires comprehensive assessment and expertise in the application of many therapeutic techniques.Given the complexity of the problerm posed @ these patients, it is not surprising that most aspects of palliative care derive from personal anecdote and clinical consensus, rather thun welldejned guidelines based on research findings.In the absence of such guidelines, unresolved issues and controversies abound.This review d&u.sses some of the most important of these topics, which range from the overall system of care and quality of assessment to the specifics o~pphu~cotherapr and other modalities of treatment.In so doing, the rationale for sake of the accepted clinical approaches can be clar$ed, others that are as yet little known can be highlighted, and the issues most in need offurther investigution can be defined.J Pain Symptom Manage 1990;5:307-319.Key Words Cancer pain, palliative care, opioid thevafi, morphine _--There is a compelling need for ongoing pain assessment and effective analgesic therapy in patients with cancer.Pain is an extremely prevalent symptom, experienced by 30% to 50% of those in active treatment and 70% to 90% of those with advanced disease.'-"Despite evidencc that most patients can be relieved of pain using readily available techniques, undertreatment i5 common.*-'Undertreatment has been ascribed to numerous factors, including inade-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analgesic Drug Therapy in Cancer Pain: Principles and Practice
Foley, K. M., & Inturrisi, C. E. (1987) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30866-5 · Cited by 103
Cited by
Buprenorphine: Considerations for Pain Management
Johnson, R. E., Fudala, P. J., & Payne, R. (2005) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.07.005 · Cited by 290
Long-term opioid therapy: Assessment of consequences and risks
Savage, S. R. (1996) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/0885-3924(95)00202-2 · Cited by 176
Outcome of Chronic Opioid Therapy for Non-Cancer Pain
Haythornthwaite, J. A., Menefee, L. A., Quatrano-Piacentini, A. L., & Pappagallo, M. (1998) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/s0885-3924(97)00352-7 · Cited by 126
Ralphs, J. A., de C Williams, A. C., Richardson, P. H., Pither, C. E., & Nicholas, M. K. (1994) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)90166-x · Cited by 70
Psychiatric and psychological perspectives on chronic pain
Howe, C. Q., Robinson, J. P., & Sullivan, M. D. (2015) · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2014.12.003 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Portenoy, R. K., & Coyle, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 307-319
- ISSN
- 0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050775237
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controversies in the long-term management of analgesic therapy in patients with advanced cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0885-3924(90)90047-n
- The paper
- Portenoy, R. K., & Coyle, N. (1990). Controversies in the long-term management of analgesic therapy in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-3924(90)90047-n
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.