Cited by 33Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

Psychiatric and psychological perspectives on chronic pain

Howe, Catherine Q., Robinson, James P., Sullivan, Mark D.·2015·Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America

Abstract

Chronic pain patients often have psychiatric disorders that negatively influence their responses to treatment. Also, many of them have dysfunctional beliefs and coping strategies, even if they do not meet DSM-5 criteria for a psychiatric disorder. Physiatrists should have a low threshold for referring both groups of patients for mental health services. This article describes psychiatric disorders that are highly prevalent among pain patients and also describes psychological processes that contribute to poor coping by the patients. Finally, it discusses factors that a physiatrist should consider in deciding whether to refer patients to psychiatrists versus psychologists.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.12.003

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with males, females have lower pain threshold and tolerance and greater pain intensity and unpleasantness for heat, cold, ischemic, and pressure pain.

    “compared to males, females demonstrate a decreased threshold and tolerance for pain and increased pain intensity and unpleasantness for heat, cold, ischemic, and pressure pain 150, 161–164”
  • Catastrophizing mediates sex differences in pain-related outcomes, clinical pain, and experimental pain.

    “catastrophizing has been shown to mediate the sex differences in pain-related outcomes, clinical pain, and experimental pain 162, 205, 206.”
  • During experimental pain tasks, Black individuals have lower pain tolerance and report higher pain intensity and unpleasantness than non-Hispanic Whites.

    “Black individuals demonstrate a lower tolerance and report higher pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings than non-Hispanic Whites during experimental pain tasks 162, 221–224”
  • Catastrophizing and praying mediate race differences in experimental pain.

    “there is evidence to suggest that both catastrophizing as well as praying mediate race differences in experimental pain 162, 222.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howe, C. Q., Robinson, J. P., & Sullivan, M. D.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Robinson, James P.
Venue
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
283-300
ISSN
1047-9651 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166668300
Cited by
33
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
chronic pain, psychiatric comorbidity, psychological factors in pain, dysfunctional attitudes, coping strategies, psychiatric referral, physiatrists
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Mental Disorders, Humans, Pain Measurement, Referral and Consultation, Chronic Pain, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review