CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 455Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CarePain Management and Opioid Use

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of symptoms among patients with advanced cancer: An international collaborative study

Open access
Vainio, Anneli, Auvinen, Anssi·1996·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
DOI 10.1016/0885-3924(96)00042-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The aims of this study were (a) to estimate the prevalence of pain and eight other common symptoms in a large population of patients with advanced cancer from different palliative care centers, and (b) to assess the differences in prevalence of the symptoms by primary site. In 1990-1991, the prevalence of eight major symptoms and performance status were assessed prospectively among 1840 cancer patients in seven hospices in Europe, the United States, and Australia. The data were collected at each institution using structured data collection sheets from the World Health Organization's (WHO) Cancer and Palliative Care Unit. The prevalence of moderate to severe pain was 51%, ranging from 43% in stomach cancer to 80% in gynecological cancers. Nausea was most prevalent in gynecological (42%) and stomach (36%) cancers, and dyspnea (46%) in lung cancer. There were statistically significant differences in the prevalence of most symptoms depending on the primary site of cancer and the hospice. Population-based follow-up studies are needed to document the incidence and prevalence of symptoms throughout the course of the disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0885-3924(96)00042-5

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 455

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Vainio, A., & Auvinen, A.
Affiliations
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Finnish Cancer Registry (FI)
ORCID
Auvinen, Anssi
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-07
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
3-10
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0885-3924(96)00042-5
OpenAlex
W2075464999
Cited by
455
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
advanced cancer, symptom prevalence, cancer pain, nausea, dyspnea, performance status, primary tumor site, gynecologic cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer, hospice care, palliative care
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Pain, Palliative Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review