Cited by 79Stress Responses and CortisolImmune Response and InflammationAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Neuro-hormonal host defence in endotoxin shock

Ramachandra, Rangappa N., Sehon, Alec H., Berczi, Istvan·1992·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

The sensitivity (LD100) of mice to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxin and to its toxic moiety, lipid A (LA), increased 500-fold after adrenalectomy (ADX). Inhibition of glucocorticoid synthesis in intact mice by metyrapone had a similar, though less dramatic, sensitizing effect to LPS. In ADX mice, the serum level of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) was 40-60 times higher than that in controls at 2 h after LPS/LA treatment. In intact mice the serum corticosterone level fell 1 h after lipid A injection to below detectable levels, which was followed by a brisk increase reaching the peak level of 48-50 micrograms/100 ml at 2 h. Both TNF production and the lethal effect of PLS/LA could be inhibited in ADX mice by glucocorticoid treatment. Plasma prolactin was increased significantly 1 h after endotoxin administration in both intact and ADX animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0889-1591(92)90015-g

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A deficient or blunted HPA axis is commonly observed in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, and disrupting the HPA axis compromises survival of normally resistant mice to septic shock.

    “On the other hand, a deficient or blunted HPA axis is commonly observed in the clinic in a wide range of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Likewise, disrupting the HPA axis surgically (through adrenalectomy) or pharmacologically (with GR antagonists) compromises the survival of normally resistant mice to septic shock (23–27).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramachandra, R. N., Sehon, A. H., & Berczi, I.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Berczi, Istvan
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-06
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
157-169
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081984658
Cited by
79
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
endotoxic shock, lipopolysaccharide, lipid A, adrenalectomy, glucocorticoids, metyrapone, TNF-α, corticosterone, prolactin, endotoxin sensitivity, glucocorticoid resistance
MeSH terms
Adrenalectomy, Animals, Corticosterone, Dexamethasone, Disease Susceptibility, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Lipid A, Lipopolysaccharides, Metyrapone, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Prolactin, Shock, Septic, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review