The DOI matches its Crossref record.
24-h ambulatory blood pressure in 352 normal Danish subjects, related to age and gender*
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The study was conducted to determine age and sex stratified normal values for 24-h ambulatory blood pressure. A sample of 352 healthy subjects (all white) were randomly selected from the community register and stratified by sex and age groups in decades from 20 to 79 years of age. Persons with a history of hypertension, cerebral apoplexy, diabetes, myocardial or renal disease, and who were taking blood pressure-influencing medication were excluded. Ambulatory blood pressure was recorded over 24 h, with measurements taken every 15 min from 07:00 to 22:59, and every 30 min from 23:00 to 6:59. Systolic blood pressure increased only slightly with age and was significantly higher in men than in women. The diastolic blood pressure increased only slightly with age in both sexes until the 50 to 59 years age group and declined thereafter. The diastolic blood pressure was not different for the two sexes. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were approximately 15% lower during the night regardless of age or sex. Ambulatory blood pressure during the daytime was on an average of 5 mm Hg lower than office blood pressure, but the mean difference between the two measurements increased with age. The variability of the difference also increased with age. IN CONCLUSION: Normal values for ambulatory blood pressure are presented in a randomly selected age- and gender-stratified population. Differences between office blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure increased with age suggesting that the previously observed higher blood pressure seen in the elderly partly might be explained by a greater impact of white coat hypertension in older people.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pickering, T. G., Hall, J. E., Appel, L. J., Falkner, B. E., Graves, J., Hill, M. N., Jones, D. W., Kurtz, T., Sheps, S. G., & Roccella, E. J. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000154900.76284.f6 · Cited by 3,985
Pickering, T. G., Hall, J. E., Appel, L. J., Falkner, B. E., Graves, J., Hill, M. N., Jones, D. W., Kurtz, T., Sheps, S. G., & Roccella, E. J. (2005) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000150859.47929.8e · Cited by 2,051
Gender differences in the regulation of blood pressure
Reckelhoff, J. F. (2001) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.37.5.1199 · Cited by 1,268
Sega, R., Facchetti, R., Bombelli, M., Cesana, G., Corrao, G., Grassi, G., & Mancia, G. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000160923.04524.5b · Cited by 1,009
Buford, T. W. (2016) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2016.01.007 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiinberg, N., Høegholm, A., Christensen, H. R., Bang, L. E., Mikkelsen, K. L., Nielsen, P. E., Svendsen, T. L., Kampmann, J. P., Madsen, N. H., & Bentzon, M. W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Hypertension
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 978-986
- ISSN
- 0895-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109396042
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in 352 normal Danish subjects, related to age and gender*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0895-7061(95)00216-2
- The paper
- Wiinberg, N., Høegholm, A., Christensen, H. R., Bang, L. E., Mikkelsen, K. L., Nielsen, P. E., Svendsen, T. L., Kampmann, J. P., Madsen, N. H., & Bentzon, M. W. (1995). 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in 352 normal Danish subjects, related to age and gender*. American Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-7061(95)00216-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.