The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prestin is required for electromotility of the outer hair cell and for the cochlear amplifier
Liberman, M. C., Gao, J., He, D. Z. Z., Wu, X., Jia, S., & Zuo, J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01059 · Cited by 931
A Test for the Diagnosis of Dead Regions in the Cochlea
Moore, B. C. J., Huss, M., Vickers, D. A., Glasberg, B. R., & Alcántara, J. I. (2000) · British Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/03005364000000131 · Cited by 444
Sound Texture Perception via Statistics of the Auditory Periphery: Evidence from Sound Synthesis
McDermott, J. H., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.032 · Cited by 403
Moore, B. C. J. (1996) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-199604000-00007 · Cited by 273
Cochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulation
Zhu, Z., Tang, Q., Zeng, F.-G., Guan, T., & Ye, D. (2012) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.005 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruggero, M. A.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 449-456
- ISSN
- 0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988508433
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0959-4388(92)90179-o
- The paper
- Ruggero, M. A. (1992). Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4388(92)90179-o
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
