The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Test for the Diagnosis of Dead Regions in the Cochlea
Abstract
Hearing impairment may sometimes be associated with complete loss of inner hair cells (IHCs) over a certain region of the basilar membrane. We call this a 'dead region'. Amplification (using a hearing aid) over a frequency range corresponding to a dead region may not be beneficial and may even impair speech intelligibility. However, diagnosis of dead regions is not easily done from the audiogram. This paper reports the design and evaluation of a method for detecting and delimiting dead regions. A noise, called 'threshold equalizing noise' (TEN), was spectrally shaped so that, for normally hearing subjects, it would give equal masked thresholds for pure tone signals at all frequencies within the range 250-10,000 Hz. Its level is specified as the level in a one-ERB (132 Hz) wide band centred at 1000 Hz. Measurements obtained from 22 normal-hearing subjects and TEN levels of 30, 50 and 70 dB/ERB confirmed that the signal level at masked threshold was approximately equal to the noise level/ERB and was almost independent of signal frequency. Masked thresholds were measured for 20 ears of 14 subjects with sensorineural hearing loss, using TEN levels of 30, 50 and 70 dB/ERB. Psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) were measured for the same subjects. When there are surviving IHCs corresponding to a frequency region with elevated absolute thresholds, a signal in that frequency region is detected via IHCs with characteristic frequencies (CFs) close to that region. In such a case, threshold in the TEN is close to that for normal-hearing listeners, provided that the noise intensity is sufficient to produce significant masking. Also, the tip of the PTC lies close to the signal frequency. When a dead region is present, the signal is detected via IHCs with CFs different from that of the signal frequency. In such a case, threshold in the TEN is markedly higher than normal, and the tip of the PTC is shifted away from the signal frequency. Generally, there was a very good correspondence between the results obtained using the TEN and the PTCs. We conclude that the measurement of masked thresholds in TEN provides a quick and simple method for the diagnosis of dead regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing: Fourth Edition
Moore, B. (1997) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004658820 · Cited by 2,646
Self-citationDischarge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve
Nelson, S. B., Watanabe, T., Thomas, E. C., & Louise, F. C. (1966) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 1,531
Preferred Method For Clinical Determination Of Pure-Tone Thresholds
Carhart, R., & Jerger, J. F. (1959) · Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders · doi:10.1044/jshd.2404.330 · Cited by 1,114
Fletcher, H. (1940) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.12.47 · Cited by 951
Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea
Ruggero, M. A., Rich, N. C., Recio, A., Narayan, S. S., & Robles, L. (1997) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.418265 · Cited by 781
Psychophysics and physiology of hearing
Thornton, A. R. D. (1978) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(78)90374-7 · Cited by 704
Cochlear Hearing Loss: Physiological, Psychological and Technical Issues
Moore, B. C. J. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470987889 · Cited by 445
Self-citationAnthropometric manikin for acoustic research
Burkhard, M. D., & Sachs, R. M. (1975) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.380648 · Cited by 376
Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea
Ruggero, M. A. (1992) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(92)90179-o · Cited by 307
The Use of Psychophysical Tuning Curves to Explore Dead Regions in the Cochlea
Moore, B. C. J., & ntara, J. I. A. (2001) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/00003446-200108000-00002 · Cited by 128
Self-citation
Cited by
Füllgrabe, C., Moore, B. C. J., & Stone, M. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347 · Cited by 527
Self-citationZeng, F.-G. (2004) · Trends in Amplification · doi:10.1177/108471380400800102 · Cited by 401
Bifurcation in brain dynamics reveals a signature of conscious processing independent of report
Sergent, C., Corazzol, M., Labouret, G., Stockart, F., Wexler, M., King, J.-R., Meyniel, F., & Pressnitzer, D. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21393-z · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, B. C. J., Huss, M., Vickers, D. A., Glasberg, B. R., & Alcántara, J. I.
- Venue
- British Journal of Audiology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 205-224
- ISSN
- 0300-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116345650
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Test for the Diagnosis of Dead Regions in the Cochlea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/03005364000000131
- The paper
- Moore, B. C. J., Huss, M., Vickers, D. A., Glasberg, B. R., & Alcántara, J. I. (2000). A Test for the Diagnosis of Dead Regions in the Cochlea. British Journal of Audiology. https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.