CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 203Information Systems Theories and ImplementationERP Systems Implementation and ImpactInformation Technology Governance and Strategy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed is project

Myers, Michael D.·1994·Accounting, Management and Information Technologies
DOI 10.1016/0959-8022(94)90022-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0959-8022(94)90022-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The document 'A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed IS project' by Myers [19] has received the highest number of citations (105 citations, or an average of 4.20 citations per year).

    “The document entitled 'A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed IS project' by Myers [19] has so far received the highest number of citations (105 citations or an average of 4.20 citations per year).”

    From Global Perspective on Payroll System Patent and Research: A Bibliometric Performance (2019) · cites this paper as [19]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Alavi, 1992, Revisiting DDS implementation research: A meta-analysis of the literature and suggestions for researchers, MIS Quarterly, 16, 95, 10.2307/249703 · DOI
  2. Boland, 1989, The experience of system design: A hermeneutic of organizational action, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 5, 87, 10.1016/0956-5221(89)90017-1 · DOI
  3. Bronsema, 1983, Education intervention and implementation in MIS, Sloan Management Review, 24, 35
  4. Dickson, 1981, Management information systems: Evolution and status, Advances in Computers, 20, 1, 10.1016/S0065-2458(08)60494-5 · DOI
  5. Ginzberg, 1978, Steps toward more effective implementation of MS and MIS, Interfaces, 8, 57, 10.1287/inte.8.3.57 · DOI
  6. Ginzberg, 1981, Key recurrent issues in the MIS implementation process, MIS Quarterly, 5, 47, 10.2307/249223 · DOI
  7. Hirschheim, 1991, Symbolism and information systems development: Myth, metaphor and magic, Information Systems Research, 2, 29, 10.1287/isre.2.1.29 · DOI
  8. Ives, 1984, User involvement and MIS success: A review of the research, Management Science, 30, 580, 10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Keen, 1981, Information systems and organizational change, Communications of the ACM, 24, 24, 10.1145/358527.358543 · DOI
  10. Klein, 1991, Rationaliy concepts in information system development methodologies, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 1, 157, 10.1016/0959-8022(91)90017-9 · DOI
  11. Kling, 1989, The institutional character of computerized information systems, Office: Technology and People, 5, 7, 10.1108/EUM0000000003526 · DOI
  12. Lee, 1991, Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research, Organization Science, 2, 342, 10.1287/orsc.2.4.342 · DOI
  13. Markus, 1983, Power, politics and MIS implementation, Communications of the ACM, 26, 430, 10.1145/358141.358148 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Newman, 1992, A social process model of user-analyst relationships, MIS Quarterly, 16, 249, 10.2307/249578 · DOI
  15. Orlikowski, 1991, Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions, Information Systems Research, 2, 1, 10.1287/isre.2.1.1 · DOI
  16. Orlikowski, 1991, Information technology and the structuring of organizations, Information Systems Research, 2, 143, 10.1287/isre.2.2.143 · DOI
  17. Ricoeur, 1981, Hermeneutics and the human sciences, 10.1017/CBO9781316534984 · DOI
  18. Robey, 1984, Rituals in information system design, MIS Quarterly, 8, 5, 10.2307/249240 · DOI
  19. Schein, 1961, Management development as a process of influence, Industrial Management Review, 2, 59
  20. Vattimo, 1988, Hermeneutics as Koine, Theory, Culture and Society, 5, 2, 10.1177/0263276488005002011 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Myers, M. D.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Myers, Michael D.
ORCID
Myers, Michael D.
Venue
Accounting, Management and Information Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-01
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
185-201
ISSN
0959-8022 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0959-8022(94)90022-1
OpenAlex
W2079028305
Cited by
203
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
20.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Accounting Management and Information Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Keywords
critical hermeneutics, information system implementation, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Paul Ricoeur, organizational failure, government information systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review