CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityNeutropenia and Cancer InfectionsFungal Infections and Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fluconazole versus amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy of unexplained fever in granulocytopenic cancer patients: a pragmatic, multicentre, prospective and randomised clinical trial

Viscoli, C., Castagnola, E., Van Lint, M.T., Moroni, C., Garaventa, A., Rossi, M.R., Fanci, R., Menichetti, F., Caselli, D., Giacchino, M., Congiu, M.·1996·European Journal of Cancer
DOI 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00619-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Amphotericin B, despite its intrinsic servere toxicity, is the most commonly used empirical antifungal therapy in cancer patients with unexplained fever not responding to empirical antibacterial therapy. The aim of this study was to show whether fluconazole was as effective as, and less toxic than, amphotericin, with no effort made to compare the antifungal activity of the two drugs. A group of 112 persistently febrile (> 38 degrees C) and granulocytopenic (< 1000 cells/mm3) cancer patients, not receiving any absorbable antifungal antibiotic for prophylaxis, with a mean age of 27 years (range 1-73 years), undergoing chemotherapy for a variety of malignancies and with a diagnosis of unexplained fever after at least 96 h of empirical antibacterial therapy, were randomised to receive either fluconazole (6 mg/kg/day up to 400 mg/day) or amphotericin B (0.8 mg/kg/day) as empirical antifungal treatment. Patients were required to have normal chest X-rays at randomisation, no previous history of aspergillosis and negative surveillance cultures for Aspergillus. The intention-to-treat analysis showed defervescence and survival without treatment modification in 42 of 56 patients (75%) in the fluconazole group and in 37 of 56 (66%) in the amphotericin B group (P = 0.4). Duration of therapy was 6 days (95% CI = 4-8 days) in both groups. Death occurred in 3 patients (5%) in the fluconazole and in 2 (4%) in the amphotericin B group. No fungal death was documented in either group. Adverse ev…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00619-2

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Klastersky, 1988, Empiric antimicrobial therapy for febrile, granulocytopenic cancer patients: lessons from 4 EORTC trials, Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol, 24, s35
  2. Pizzo, 1982, Empiric antibiotic and antifungal therapy for cancer patients with prolonged fever and granulocytopenia, Am J Med, 72, 101, 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90594-0 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Talcott, 1988, The medical course of cancer patients with fever and neutropenia, Arch Intern Med, 148, 2561, 10.1001/archinte.1988.00380120031007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 122

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Viscoli, C., Castagnola, E., Van Lint, M. T., Moroni, C., Garaventa, A., Rossi, M. R., Fanci, R., Menichetti, F., Caselli, D., Giacchino, M., & Congiu, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
  • University of Perugia (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Ospedale Regina Margherita (IT)
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
Corresponding author
Viscoli, C.
ORCID
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-05
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
814-820
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0959-8049(95)00619-2
OpenAlex
W2068893995
Cited by
122
References
29
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
fluconazole, amphotericin B, empirical antifungal therapy, fever of unknown origin, febrile neutropenia, chemotherapy toxicity, antifungal toxicity, invasive fungal infections, Aspergillus, defervescence, treatment discontinuation, adverse events
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Agranulocytosis, Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Fever, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Mycoses, Neoplasms, Opportunistic Infections, Prospective Studies, Fluconazole, Immunocompromised Host, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review