Cited by 220Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationCoagulation and Flocculation Studies

Removal of metals from electroplating wastes using banana pith

Low, K.S., Lee, C.K., Leo, A.C.·1995·Bioresource Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0960-8524(94)00123-i

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Low, K. S., Lee, C. K., & Leo, A. C.
Corresponding author
Low, K.S.
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-01
Volume
51
Issue
2-3
Pages
227-231
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041429917
Cited by
220
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
Keywords
biosorption, electroplating waste, heavy metal removal, copper, nickel, lead, zinc, chromium, Langmuir isotherm, competitive adsorption, breakthrough curves, low-cost biosorbent

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review