The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Nilsson, 1995, The carbon sequestration potential of a global afforestation program, Climatic Change, 30, 267, 10.1007/BF01091928 · DOI
- Winjum, 1993, Forest management and carbon storage: an analysis of 12 key forest nations, Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 70, 239, 10.1007/BF01105000 · DOI
- Kolchugina, 1993, Carbon sources and sinks in forest biomass of the former Soviet Union, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 7, 291, 10.1029/93GB00571 · DOI
- Sampson, 1993, Biomass management and energy, Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 70, 139, 10.1007/BF01104993 · DOI
- Sampson, 1993, Biomass management and energy, Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 70, 139, 10.1007/BF01104993 · DOI
- Marland, 1992, Should we store carbon in trees?, Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 64, 181, 10.1007/BF00477101 · DOI
- Dewar, 1991, Analytical model of carbon storage in the trees, soils and wood products of managed forests, Tree Physiology, 8, 239, 10.1093/treephys/8.3.239 · DOI
- Dewar, 1992, Carbon sequestration in the trees, products and soils of forest plantations: an analysis using UK examples, Tree Physiology, 11, 49, 10.1093/treephys/11.1.49 · DOI · Paper page
- Burschel, 1993, Present role of German forests and forestry in the national carbon budget and options to its increase, Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 70, 325, 10.1007/BF01105005 · DOI
- Burschel, 1993, Die Rolle von Wald und Forstwirtschaft im Kohlenstoffhaushalt—Eine Betrachtung für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Forstliche Forschungsberichte, München, Nr. 126
Cited by
How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration?
Jandl, R., Lindner, M., Vesterdal, L., Bauwens, B., Baritz, R., Hagedorn, F., Johnson, D. W., Minkkinen, K., & Byrne, K. A. (2007) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003 · Cited by 1,458
Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration
Ramachandran Nair, P. K., Mohan Kumar, B., & Nair, V. D. (2009) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.200800030 · Cited by 1,157
CHERUBINI, F., PETERS, G. P., BERNTSEN, T., STRØMMAN, A. H., & HERTWICH, E. (2011) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01102.x · Cited by 645
“Many analytical models are available to perform this type of temporal analysis (Schlamadinger & Marland, 1996a; Masera et al., 2003; Schelhaas et al., 2004; Kurz et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodReviving the carbohydrate economy via multi-product lignocellulose biorefineries
Zhang, Y.-H. P. (2008) · Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s10295-007-0293-6 · Cited by 622
Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution
Sathre, R., & O’Connor, J. (2010) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.12.005 · Cited by 537
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlamadinger, B., & Marland, G.
- Venue
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 275-300
- ISSN
- 0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009448182
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (1996-01-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0961-9534(95)00113-1
- The paper
- Schlamadinger, B., & Marland, G. (1996). The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle. Biomass and Bioenergy. https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(95)00113-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
