Cited by 1,157Agroforestry and silvopastoral systemsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsForest Management and Policy

Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration

Ramachandran Nair, P. K., Mohan Kumar, B., Nair, Vimala D.·2009·Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Abstract

Abstract During the past three decades, agroforestry has become recognized the world over as an integrated approach to sustainable land use because of its production and environmental benefits. Its recent recognition as a greenhouse gas–mitigation strategy under the Kyoto Protocol has earned it added attention as a strategy for biological carbon (C) sequestration. The perceived potential is based on the premise that the greater efficiency of integrated systems in resource (nutrients, light, and water) capture and utilization than single‐species systems will result in greater net C sequestration. Available estimates of C‐sequestration potential of agroforestry systems are derived by combining information on the aboveground, time‐averaged C stocks and the soil C values; but they are generally not rigorous. Methodological difficulties in estimating C stock of biomass and the extent of soil C storage under varying conditions are compounded by the lack of reliable estimates of area under agroforestry. We estimate that the area currently under agroforestry worldwide is 1,023 million ha. Additionally, substantial extent of areas of unproductive crop, grass, and forest lands as well as degraded lands could be brought under agroforestry. The extent of C sequestered in any agroforestry system will depend on a number of site‐specific biological, climatic, soil, and management factors. Furthermore, the profitability of C‐sequestration projects will depend on the price of C in the international market, additional income from the sale of products such as timber, and the cost related to C monitoring. Our knowledge on these issues is unfortunately rudimentary. Until such difficulties are surmounted, the low‐cost environmental benefit of agroforestry will continue to be underappreciated and underexploited.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jpln.200800030

Cites

129 of 129 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When agroforestry systems such as silvopasture are applied in suitable locations, C is sequestered in soil and tree biomass, promoting C uptake by expanding niches, lengthening growing season, and enhancing soil fertility with N-fixing species.

    “when agroforestry systems, such as silvopasture, are applied in suitable locations, C is sequestered in soil as well as in tree biomass, which could promote C uptake by expanding the niches from which water and soil nutrients are drawn, lengthening the growing season, and enhancing soil fertility when N-fixing species are included as part of the system.184”

    From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [184]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramachandran Nair, P. K., Mohan Kumar, B., & Nair, V. D.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02
Volume
172
Issue
1
Pages
10-23
ISSN
  • 1436-8730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2624
OpenAlex
W2007749762
Cited by
1,157
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 42
FWCI
89.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
agroforestry, carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, Kyoto Protocol, aboveground carbon, soil carbon storage, carbon stock estimation, carbon price, degraded area recovery, sustainable land use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review