The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electrode dimensions of the Bayard-Alpert ionization gauge and its sensitivity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Collector position in the centre of the anode gave maximum sensitivity.
“The collector position in the centre of the anode gave the maximum sensitivity [12,16].”
From A review on hot cathode ionisation gauges with focus on a suitable design for measurement accuracy and stability (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
A large diameter (40 mm) with at the same time small length (5 mm) appeared unfavourable.
“However, a large diameter (40 mm) with at the same time small length (5 mm) appeared unfavourable [16].”
From A review on hot cathode ionisation gauges with focus on a suitable design for measurement accuracy and stability (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
Forming a thin wire into a helical one gave the same sensitivity as a 1 mm wire.
“Forming a thin wire into a helical one (0.15 mm wire into a helical diameter of 1 mm with 6 turns per 1 mm) gave the same sensitivity as a 1 mm wire [16].”
From A review on hot cathode ionisation gauges with focus on a suitable design for measurement accuracy and stability (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
Groszkowski found sensitivity decreases monotonically by about a factor of 10 when collector diameter dc was changed from 2 mm to 9 μm.
“He found that the sensitivity decreases monotonically by about a factor of 10 when the collector diameter d c was changed from 2 mm to 9 μm [16].”
From A review on hot cathode ionisation gauges with focus on a suitable design for measurement accuracy and stability (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
Groszkowski estimated the number of oscillations of electrons as 2 to 4, with higher number for smaller grid wire diameters.
“Groszkowski also estimated the number of oscillations of the electrons and found 2 to 4 oscillations, where the higher number is true for smaller grid wire diameters [16].”
From A review on hot cathode ionisation gauges with focus on a suitable design for measurement accuracy and stability (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
Sensitivity increased with the length of the collector wire, with the larger effect for bigger diameters.
“The sensitivity also increased with the length of the collector wire, with the larger effect for bigger diameters [16].”
From A review on hot cathode ionisation gauges with focus on a suitable design for measurement accuracy and stability (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
Replacing one collector wire by four parallel wires forming a square prism increased sensitivity by 20% only.
“Replacing the one collector wire by four parallel of the same kind forming a square prism did increase the sensitivity by 20% only [16].”
From A review on hot cathode ionisation gauges with focus on a suitable design for measurement accuracy and stability (2020) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Florescu, 1961, New thermionic ionization gauge, Vide
- Freytag, 1963, Realization of a Bayard-Alpert gauge, Suppl al Nuovo Cimento, 1
- Groszkowski, 1964, Sensitivity gain due to electron oscillations in the Bayard-Alpert ionization gauge, Bull Acad Polon Sci Ser sci techn, 12, 87
- Groszkowski, 1965, Collector dimensions and sensitivity in Bayard-Alpert ionization gauge, ibid., 177
- Groszkowski, 1965, Cathode dimensions and sensitivity in Bayard-Alpert ionization gauge, ibid., 261
- Groszkowski, 1965, Bayard-Alpert ionization gauge sensitivity vs collector position in anode cross-section, ibid., 320
- Holloway, 1948, Design of an ionization manometer tube, Electrical Communication, 25, 337
- J J Kinsella, The dependence of ionization gauge sensitivity on electrode geometry, 1954, Vac Symp Trans, June 16–17–18, 65 (1955).
- Morgulis, 1934, Zur Theorie des Ionisationsmanometers, Phys Z UdSSR, 5, 407
- Nottingham, 1955, Design and properties of the modified Bayard-Alpert gauge, Vac Symp Trans, June 16–17–18, 76
- van Oostrom, 1962, A Bayard-Alpert type ionization gauge with a low X-ray limit, 1961, Trans 8th Nat Vac Symp., 443
- Schuetze, 1962, Über den Einfluss der Systemgeometrie and der Betriebsbedingungen auf die Gasionenkonstante von Ionisations-manometerröhren nach Bayard-Alpert, Vakuum-Technik, 11
- Schroff, 1963, Jauge à ionisation du type Bayard-Alpert, Vide, 460
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jousten, K., Boineau, F., Bundaleski, N., Illgen, C., Setina, J., Teodoro, O. M. N. D., Vicar, M., & Wüest, M. (2020) · Vacuum · doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109545 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Groszkowski, J.
- Affiliations
- Warsaw University of Technology (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Groszkowski, J
- Venue
- 1965 Transactions of the Third International Vacuum Congress
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1967
- Pages
- 241-244
- OpenAlex
- W2504216070
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and Diagnostics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Calibration and Measurement Techniques
- Keywords
- electrode size, gauge sensitivity, ionization gauge, vacuum pressure measurement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review