Cited by 277Fusion materials and technologiesNuclear materials and radiation effectsNuclear Materials and Properties

Radiation-Induced Effects on Microstructure

Zinkle, S.J.·2012·Comprehensive Nuclear Materials

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-08-056033-5.00003-3

Cites

310 of 310 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zinkle, S. J.
Affiliations
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Zinkle, S.J.
Venue
Comprehensive Nuclear Materials
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2012
Pages
65-98
OpenAlex
W29733610
Cited by
277
References
310
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4
FWCI
10.50
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Fusion materials and technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nuclear materials and radiation effects
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nuclear Materials and Properties
Keywords
radiation damage, irradiation-induced microstructure, dislocation loops, stacking fault tetrahedra, cavities, precipitates, crystalline-to-amorphous phase transition, amorphization, radiation dose, temperature effects, defect clusters, solute atoms, irradiation embrittlement, irradiation creep, irradiation growth, void swelling, helium embrittlement, metals, ceramics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review