Cited by 27Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPsychology Research and BibliometricsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Vote-Counting Methods

Larry Vernon Hedges, Ingram Olkin·1985·Elsevier eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1016/b978-0-08-057065-5.50009-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect sizes were adjusted according to Hedges and Olkin (1985) to account for bias in sample sizes.

    “We adjusted the effect sizes (ES) according to Hedges and Olkin, (1985) to account for bias in sample sizes, according to this”

    From A Meta-Analysis of Ten Learning Techniques (2021) · cites this paper as Hedges and Olkin, (1985)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Elsevier eBooks
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1985
Pages
47-74
OpenAlex
W2506046274
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
effect size estimation, standardized mean difference, correlation coefficient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review