CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 628Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesGender and Feminist StudiesArchaeological and Geological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Archaeology and the Study of Gender

CONKEY, MARGARET W., SPECTOR, JANET D.·1984·Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-003107-8.50006-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-003107-8.50006-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 1984, Conkey and Spector published 'Archaeology and the Study of Gender', which systematically addressed the subject of gender within the field of archaeology.

    “Already in 1984, Conkey and Spector (1984) had published”

    From Women in Israelite Religion: The State of Research Is All New Research (2019) · cites this paper as Conkey and Spector 1984

  • In the 1990s, the rapid growth in historical archaeology of feminist theorizing and research focusing on gender roles, identities, relationships and power dynamics in intersections with class, ethnicity, race and/or religion was facilitated by five prior developments: gender theorizing in prehistoric archaeology, research on systemic racism in American slavery and Reconstruction, Neo-Marxism, and

    “In the 1990s, the rapid growth in historical archaeology of feminist theorizing and research focusing on gender roles, identities, relationships and power dynamics in intersections with class, ethnicity, race and/or religion was facilitated by previous (1) gender theorizing and research in prehistoric archaeology”

    From Introduction to Archaeologies Special Issue on Intersectionality Theory and Research in Historical Archaeology (2022) · cites this paper as Conkey & Spector, 1984

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. Adams, 1974, Anthropological perspectives on trade, Current Anthropology, 15, 239, 10.1086/201466 · DOI
  2. Atkinson, 1982, Review essay: anthropology, Signs, 8, 236, 10.1086/493961 · DOI
  3. Binford, 1980, Willow smoke and dogs' tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation, American Antiquity, 45, 4, 10.2307/279653 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Binford, 1968, Stone tools and human behavior, Scientific American, 220, 70, 10.1038/scientificamerican0469-70 · DOI
  5. Binford, 1982, Paradigms, systematics and archaeology, Journal of Anthropological Research, 38, 137, 10.1086/jar.38.2.3629594 · DOI
  6. Bossen, 1975, Women in modernizing societies, American Ethnologist, 2, 587, 10.1525/ae.1975.2.4.02a00010 · DOI
  7. Bunn, 1981, Archaeological evidence for meat-eating by Plio Pleistocene hominids from Koobi Fora and Olduvai Gorge, Nature, 291, 574, 10.1038/291574a0 · DOI
  8. Carpenter, D. 1980 A structural analysis of vernacular architecture. The degree of privatization and its functional implications. B. A. honors thesis, Department of Anthropology, State University of New York, Binghamton, New York.
  9. Flannery, 1967, Culture-history vs. culture-process. Review of An introduction to American archaeology: North and Middle America (vol. 1) by Gordon R. Willey, Scientific American, 3, 399
  10. Flannery, 1976, Formative Oaxaca and the Zapotec cosmos, American Scientist, 64, 374
  11. Haraway, 1979, Sex, mind, and profit: from human engineering to sociobiology, Radical History Review, 20, 206, 10.1215/01636545-1979-20-206 · DOI
  12. Haraway, 1982, Signs of dominance, Studies in History of Biology, 6, 129
  13. Harris, 1976, Population, warfare, and the male supremacist complex, American Anthropologist, 78, 521, 10.1525/aa.1976.78.3.02a00020 · DOI
  14. Hartman, 1975, Capitalism, partriarchy, and job segregation by sex, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1, 137, 10.1086/493283 · DOI
  15. Helms, 1976, Domestic organization in Eastern Central America: The San Blas Cuna, Miskito, and Black Carib compared, W. Canadian Journal of Anthropology, VI, 133
  16. Hochschild, 1973, A review of sex role research, American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1011, 10.1086/225418 · DOI
  17. Isaac, 1978, The food-sharing behavior of protohuman hominids, Scientific American, 238, 90, 10.1038/scientificamerican0478-90 · DOI
  18. Isaac, 1978, “Food sharing and human evolution: archaeological evidence from the Plio-Pleistocene of South Africa.”, Journal of Anthropological Research, 34, 311
  19. Isbell, 1976, Cosmological order expressed in prehistoric ceremonial centers, Actes du XLII Congres International des Americanistes, IV, 269
  20. Kohl, 1975, The archaeology of trade, Dialectical Anthropology, 1, 43, 10.1007/BF00244567 · DOI
  21. Klein, 1976, “She's one of us, you know”—the public life of Tlingit women: traditional, historical, and contemporary perspectives, Western Canadian Journal of Anthropology, VI, 164
  22. Lamphere, 1977, Review essay: anthropology, Signs, Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 2, 612, 10.1086/493391 · DOI
  23. Lancaster, 1978, Caring and sharing in human evolution, Human Behavior, 1, 82
  24. Leacock, 1978, Women's status and egalitarian society: implications for social evolution, Current Anthropology, 19, 247, 10.1086/202074 · DOI
  25. Lee, R. B. 1965 Subsistence ecology of !Kung bushmen. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.
  26. Leone, 1982, Some opinions about recovering mind, American Antiquity, 47, 742, 10.2307/280280 · DOI
  27. Longacre, W. A. 1963 Archeology as anthropology: a case study. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.
  28. Lovejoy, 1981, The origin of man, Science, 211, 341, 10.1126/science.211.4480.341 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Matthiasson, 1976, “Northern Baffin Island women in three cultural periods, Western Canadian Journal of Anthropology, VI, 201
  30. McNamara, 1973, The power of women through the family in medieval Europe: 500–1100, Feminist Studies, I, 126
  31. Milton, 1978, Male bias in anthropology, Man, 14, 40, 10.2307/2801639 · DOI
  32. Minnich, 1982, “A devastating conceptual error: how can we not be feminist scholars?”, Change Magazine, 14, 7, 10.1080/00091383.1982.10569858 · DOI
  33. Mintz, 1971, Men, women and trade, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 13, 247, 10.1017/S0010417500006277 · DOI
  34. Moore, H. (editor) in Women, archaeology and material culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. press
  35. Muller, 1977, The formation of the state and the oppression of women: A case study in England and Wales, Radical Review of Political Economy, 9, 7, 10.1177/048661347700900302 · DOI
  36. Myers, 1978, The roots of restriction: women in early Israel, Biblical Archeologist, 41, 91, 10.2307/3209454 · DOI
  37. Nash, 1978, The Aztecs and the ideology of male dominance, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 4, 349, 10.1086/493612 · DOI
  38. Nash, 1977, Ideologies of sex: archetypes and stereotypes, Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 285, 618, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb29384.x · DOI
  39. Ortner, 1976, The virigin and the state, Michigan papers in anthropology, 2
  40. Parker-Pearson, 1982, Mortuary practices, society and ideology: an ethnoarcheological study, 99
  41. Pfeiffer, 1980, Current research casts new light on human origins, Smithsonian, 11, 91
  42. Potts, R. 1982 Caches, campsites and other ideas about earliest archaeological sites. Paper presented at Symposium, Origins of Culture: John Hopkins University Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland.
  43. Rapp, 1979, Review essay: anthropology, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 4, 497, 10.1086/493634 · DOI
  44. Rapp, R. 1982 Introduction to Worlds in collision: the impact of feminist scholarship in anthropology. A Symposium presented at the 1982 annual meetings, American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C.
  45. Reiter, 1978, The search for origins: unraveling the threads of gender hierarchy, Critique of Anthropology, 3, 5
  46. Rogers, 1975, Female forms of power and the myth of male dominance: a model of female/male interaction in peasant society, American Ethnologist, 2, 727, 10.1525/ae.1975.2.4.02a00090 · DOI
  47. Rogers, 1978, “Women's place: a critical review of anthropological theory,”, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 20, 123, 10.1017/S0010417500008859 · DOI
  48. Rosaldo, 1980, The use and abuse of anthropology: reflections on feminism and cross-cultural understanding, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5, 389, 10.1086/493727 · DOI
  49. Rothenberg, 1976, Erosion of power—an economic basis for the selective conservatism of Seneca women in the 19th century, Western Canadian Journal of Anthropology, VI
  50. Sacks, 1976, State bias and women's status, American Anthropologist, 78, 565, 10.1525/aa.1976.78.3.02a00040 · DOI
  51. Schuck, 1974, A symposium: masculine blinders in the social sciences, Social Science Quarterly, 55, 563
  52. Silverblatt, 1978, Andean women in the Inca empire, Feminist Studies, 4, 37, 10.2307/3177537 · DOI
  53. Spector, J. D. 1981 Male/female task differentiation: A framework for integrating historical and archeological materials in the study of gender and colonization. Paper presented at the 5th Berkshire Conference on the History of Women, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York.
  54. Stocking, 1965, On the limits of ‘presentism’ and ‘historicism’ in the historiography of the behavioral sciences, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, I, 211, 10.1002/1520-6696(196507)1:3<211::AID-JHBS2300010302>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
  55. Tanner, 1976, Women in evolution. Part I. Innovation and selection in human origins, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1, 104, 10.1086/493245 · DOI
  56. Van Allen, 1972, Sitting on a man: colonialism and the lost political institutions of Igbo women, Canadian Journal of African Studies, 6, 165, 10.2307/484197 · DOI
  57. Wallman, 1976, Difference, differentiation, discrimination, New Community: Journal of the community Relations Commission, V
  58. 1982, Archaeology of the household: building a prehistory of domestic life, A Special issue of American Behavioral Scientist, 25, 611
  59. Wobst, 1978, The archaeo-ethnology of hunter-gatherers, or the tyranny of the ethnographic record in archaeology, American Antiquity, 43, 303, 10.2307/279256 · DOI
  60. Wylie, M. A. 1981 Positivism and the new archeology. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Philosophy, State University of New York, Binghamton.
  61. Yanagisako, 1979, Family and household: the analysis of domestic groups, Annual Review of Anthropology, 8, 161, 10.1146/annurev.an.08.100179.001113 · DOI
  62. Yellen, 1972, Hunter-gatherer populations and archaeological inference, World Archaeology, 4, 244, 10.1080/00438243.1972.9979535 · DOI
  63. Zihlman, 1978, Women in evolution, part II: subsistence and social organization in early hominids, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 4, 4, 10.1086/493566 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
CONKEY, M. W., & SPECTOR, J. D.
ORCID
CONKEY, MARGARET W.
Venue
Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1984
Pages
1-38
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-12-003107-8.50006-2
OpenAlex
W349014897
Cited by
628
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 22
FWCI
14.60
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
gender archaeology, gender stereotypes, androcentrism, gender roles, gender ideology, archaeological interpretation, methodological barriers, task differentiation, subsistence systems, spatial organization, material culture, cultural solidarity, cultural change, gender dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review