The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Creativity in Organizations
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Creativity is considered an antecedent to the innovation [9] critical for companies to perform and grow [93].”
From The Impact of Generative AI on Creativity in Software Development: A Research Agenda (2025) · cites this paper as [93]
Citations
Cites
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,243
Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators
Damanpour, F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256406 · Cited by 6,542
Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165852 · Cited by 4,959
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: PERSONAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS AT WORK.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256657 · Cited by 3,749
Guilford, J. P. (1950) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0063487 · Cited by 3,588
Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Tabrizi, B. N. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393701 · Cited by 2,426
IS SLACK GOOD OR BAD FOR INNOVATION?
Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256998 · Cited by 2,182
Expert performance: its structure and acquisition.
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.725 · Cited by 2,072
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Simonton, 1999, Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian?, Psychological Inquiry, 10, 309
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Journal of Managerial Psychology
Waller, M. J., Giambatista, R. C., & Zellmer-bruhn, M. E. (1992) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/eb004440 · Cited by 257
Bunjak, A., Černe, M., & Popovič, A. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103533 · Cited by 127
The dark side of creativity: Coworker envy and ostracism as a response to employee creativity
Breidenthal, A. P., Liu, D., Bai, Y., & Mao, Y. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.08.001 · Cited by 109
The Collective Origins of Valued Originality
Haslam, S. A., Adarves‐Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Jans, L. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868313498001 · Cited by 96
Resilience estimation of critical infrastructure systems: Application of expert judgment
Mottahedi, A., Sereshki, F., Ataei, M., Qarahasanlou, A. N., & Barabadi, A. (2021) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2021.107849 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Mumford, M. D., Hester, K. S., & Robledo, I. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Oklahoma (US)
- Venue
- Handbook of Organizational Creativity
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2012
- Pages
- 3-16
- OpenAlex
- W2478391636
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 16.17
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- creativity, innovation, organizational creativity, idea generation, problem solving, levels of analysis, individual, group and organizational levels
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
