The Physiology and Molecular Biology of Sponge Tissues
Abstract
Sponges have become the focus of studies on molecular evolution and the evolution of animal body plans due to their ancient branching point in the metazoan lineage. Whereas our former understanding of sponge function was largely based on a morphological perspective, the recent availability of the first full genome of a sponge (Amphimedon queenslandica), and of the transcriptomes of other sponges, provides a new way of understanding sponges by their molecular components. This wealth of genetic information not only confirms some long-held ideas about sponge form and function but also poses new puzzles. For example, the Amphimedon sponge genome tells us that sponges possess a repertoire of genes involved in control of cell proliferation and in regulation of development. In vitro expression studies with genes involved in stem cell maintenance confirm that archaeocytes are the main stem cell population and are able to differentiate into many cell types in the sponge including pinacocytes and choanocytes. Therefore, the diverse roles of archaeocytes imply differential gene expression within a single cell ontogenetically, and gene expression is likely also different in different species; but what triggers cells to enter one pathway and not another and how each archaeocyte cell type can be identified based on this gene knowledge are new challenges. Whereas molecular data provide a powerful new tool for interpreting sponge form and function, because sponges are suspension feeders, their body plan and physiology are very much dependent on their physical environment, and in particular on flow. Therefore, in order to integrate new knowledge of molecular data into a better understanding the sponge body plan, it is important to use an organismal approach. In this chapter, we give an account of sponge body organization as it relates to the physiology of the sponge in light of new molecular data. We focus, in particular, on the structure of sponge tissues and review descriptive as well as experimental work on choanocyte morphology and function. Special attention is given to pinacocyte epithelia, cell junctions, and the molecules present in sponge epithelia. Studies describing the role of the pinacoderm in sensing, coordination, and secretion are reviewed. A wealth of recent work describes gene presence and expression patterns in sponge tissues during development, and we review this in the context of the previous descriptions of sponge morphology and physiology. A final section addresses recent findings of genes involved in the immune response. This review is far from exhaustive but intends rather to revisit for non-specialists key aspects of sponge morphology and physiology in light of new molecular data as a means to better understand and interpret sponge form and function today.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sponges feed based on one of the most efficient water filtering systems in the animal kingdom: an intricate canal system of choanocyte chambers generates water flow through a multitude of inlet pores.
“Sponges feed based on one of the most efficient water filtering systems in the animal kingdom: an intricate canal system of choanocyte chambers generates water flow through a multitude of inlet pores (Fig. 2b) (Harrison and de Vos 1991; Leys and Hill 2012).”
From A non-bilaterian perspective on the development and evolution of animal digestive systems (2019) · cites this paper as Leys and Hill 2012
Cites
Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life
Dunn, C. W., Hejnol, A., Matus, D. Q., Pang, K., Browne, W. E., Smith, S. A., Seaver, E., Rouse, G. W., Obst, M., Edgecombe, G. D., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06614 · Cited by 1,921 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This, together with the suggestion that ctenophores might be basal to sponges (Dunn et al., 2008), implies that sponges may not be ‘witnesses to the pre-history’ of animal systems as was suggested earlier by Pavans de Ceccatty (1974a) but may instead have lost complex animal characters, even neurons, however, unusual…”
BackgroundThe Amphimedon queenslandica genome and the evolution of animal complexity
Srivastava, M., Simakov, O., Chapman, J., Fahey, B., Gauthier, M. E. A., Mitros, T., Richards, G. S., Conaco, C., Dacre, M., Hellsten, U., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09201 · Cited by 1,049 · see citing works
Self-citationUnexpected complexity of the Wnt gene family in a sea anemone
Kusserow, A., Pang, K., Sturm, C., Hrouda, M., Lentfer, J., Schmidt, H. A., Technau, U., von Haeseler, A., Hobmayer, B., Martindale, M. Q., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03158 · Cited by 599 · see citing works
A Post-Synaptic Scaffold at the Origin of the Animal Kingdom
Sakarya, O., Armstrong, K. A., Adamska, M., Adamski, M., Wang, I.-F., Tidor, B., Degnan, B. M., Oakley, T. H., & Kosik, K. S. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000506 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Yahel, G., Sharp, J. H., Marie, D., Häse2, C., & Genin, A. (2003) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2003.48.1.0141 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Evolution of sodium channels predates the origin of nervous systems in animals
Liebeskind, B. J., Hillis, D. M., & Zakon, H. H. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1106363108 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Embryogenesis and larval differentiation in sponges
Leys, S. P., & Ereskovsky, A. V. (2006) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z05-170 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citationAlié, A., & Manuel, M. (2010) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-34 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gastric pouches and the mucociliary sole: setting the stage for nervous system evolution
Arendt, D., Benito-Gutierrez, E., Brunet, T., & Marlow, H. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0286 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Choanoflagellate and choanocyte collar-flagellar systems and the assumption of homology
Mah, J. L., Christensen‐Dalsgaard, K. K., & Leys, S. P. (2014) · Evolution & Development · doi:10.1111/ede.12060 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationThe architecture of cell differentiation in choanoflagellates and sponge choanocytes
Laundon, D., Larson, B. T., McDonald, K., King, N., & Burkhardt, P. (2019) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000226 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
A non-bilaterian perspective on the development and evolution of animal digestive systems
Steinmetz, P. R. H. (2019) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-019-03075-x · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“…have revealed the presence of some typical epithelial components (cell polarity and cell junction genes), and a capacity to seal their internal space from the environment (Adams et al. 2010; Belahbib et al. 2018; Fahey and Degnan 2010; Leys and Hill 2012; Leys et al. 2009; Riesgo et al. 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialNew genomic data and analyses challenge the traditional vision of animal epithelium evolution
Belahbib, H., Renard, E., Santini, S., Jourda, C., Claverie, J.-M., Borchiellini, C., & Le Bivic, A. (2018) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-018-4715-9 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leys, S. P., & Hill, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- University of Richmond (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leys, Sally P.
- Venue
- Advances in Marine Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 62
- Pages
- 1-56
- ISSN
- 0065-2881 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W85784277
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in marine biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Marine Sponges and Natural Products
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Keywords
- sponges, sponge physiology, Amphimedon queenslandica, sponge genome, archaeocytes, stem cell maintenance, cell differentiation, choanocytes, pinacocytes, cell junctions, filter feeding, flow, sponge development
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biological Evolution, Phylogeny, Porifera, Signal Transduction, Genome, Evolution, Molecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review