Cited by 128Marine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyMarine Sponges and Natural ProductsDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

The Physiology and Molecular Biology of Sponge Tissues

Leys, Sally P., Hill, April·2012·Advances in Marine Biology

Abstract

Sponges have become the focus of studies on molecular evolution and the evolution of animal body plans due to their ancient branching point in the metazoan lineage. Whereas our former understanding of sponge function was largely based on a morphological perspective, the recent availability of the first full genome of a sponge (Amphimedon queenslandica), and of the transcriptomes of other sponges, provides a new way of understanding sponges by their molecular components. This wealth of genetic information not only confirms some long-held ideas about sponge form and function but also poses new puzzles. For example, the Amphimedon sponge genome tells us that sponges possess a repertoire of genes involved in control of cell proliferation and in regulation of development. In vitro expression studies with genes involved in stem cell maintenance confirm that archaeocytes are the main stem cell population and are able to differentiate into many cell types in the sponge including pinacocytes and choanocytes. Therefore, the diverse roles of archaeocytes imply differential gene expression within a single cell ontogenetically, and gene expression is likely also different in different species; but what triggers cells to enter one pathway and not another and how each archaeocyte cell type can be identified based on this gene knowledge are new challenges. Whereas molecular data provide a powerful new tool for interpreting sponge form and function, because sponges are suspension feeders, their body plan and physiology are very much dependent on their physical environment, and in particular on flow. Therefore, in order to integrate new knowledge of molecular data into a better understanding the sponge body plan, it is important to use an organismal approach. In this chapter, we give an account of sponge body organization as it relates to the physiology of the sponge in light of new molecular data. We focus, in particular, on the structure of sponge tissues and review descriptive as well as experimental work on choanocyte morphology and function. Special attention is given to pinacocyte epithelia, cell junctions, and the molecules present in sponge epithelia. Studies describing the role of the pinacoderm in sensing, coordination, and secretion are reviewed. A wealth of recent work describes gene presence and expression patterns in sponge tissues during development, and we review this in the context of the previous descriptions of sponge morphology and physiology. A final section addresses recent findings of genes involved in the immune response. This review is far from exhaustive but intends rather to revisit for non-specialists key aspects of sponge morphology and physiology in light of new molecular data as a means to better understand and interpret sponge form and function today.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-394283-8.00001-1

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sponges feed based on one of the most efficient water filtering systems in the animal kingdom: an intricate canal system of choanocyte chambers generates water flow through a multitude of inlet pores.

    “Sponges feed based on one of the most efficient water filtering systems in the animal kingdom: an intricate canal system of choanocyte chambers generates water flow through a multitude of inlet pores (Fig. 2b) (Harrison and de Vos 1991; Leys and Hill 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leys, S. P., & Hill, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Richmond (US)
Corresponding author
Leys, Sally P.
Venue
Advances in Marine Biology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2012
Volume
62
Pages
1-56
ISSN
0065-2881 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W85784277
Cited by
128
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4
FWCI
10.38
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in marine biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Marine Sponges and Natural Products
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
sponges, sponge physiology, Amphimedon queenslandica, sponge genome, archaeocytes, stem cell maintenance, cell differentiation, choanocytes, pinacocytes, cell junctions, filter feeding, flow, sponge development
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Phylogeny, Porifera, Signal Transduction, Genome, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review