Cited by 625Visual Attention and Saliency DetectionFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Salience Network

Menon, V.·2015·Brain Mapping

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00052-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 97 · Cited by 625

Metadata

Authors
Menon, V.
Corresponding author
Menon, V.
Venue
Brain Mapping
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2015
Pages
597-611
OpenAlex
W4256106179
Cited by
625
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 2
FWCI
98.08
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
salience network, brain networks, salience, attention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review