Cited by 417Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics

The “Past” and the “Delayed-Choice” Double-Slit Experiment

Wheeler, John Archibald·1978·Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-473250-6.50006-6

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the proposed experiment, the agents never make any choices.

    “In fact, in the proposed experiment, the agents never make any choices (also no delayed ones, as e.g., in Wheeler’s “delayed choice” experiment63).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wheeler, J. A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Wheeler, John Archibald
Venue
Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1978
Pages
9-48
OpenAlex
W193210549
Cited by
416
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.73
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Keywords
double-slit experiment, delayed-choice experiment, wave-particle duality, quantum interference, single-slit diffraction, photon paths, quantum measurement, complementarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review