CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionFreedom of Expression and Defamation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The rising threat of cyberhate for young people around the globe

Bauman, Sheri, Perry, Vanessa M., Wachs, Sebastian·2021·Child and Adolescent Online Risk Exposure
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-817499-9.00008-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-817499-9.00008-9

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Akers, 1979, Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory, American Sociological Review, 636, 10.2307/2094592 · DOI
  2. Aricak, 2008, Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 253, 10.1089/cpb.2007.0016 · DOI
  3. Badaly, 2012, Social status, perceived social reputations, and perceived dyadic relationships in early adolescence, Social Development, 21, 482, 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00646.x · DOI
  4. Bayard, 2014, Prosoziales Verhalten in Kindheit und Adoleszenz, Zeitschrift Für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 10.1026/0049-8637/a000113 · DOI
  5. Beelmann, 2017, Prävention von Radikalisierungsprozessen: Grundlagen entwicklungsorientierter Maßnahmen, Neue Kriminalpolitik, 29, 440, 10.5771/0934-9200-2017-4-440 · DOI
  6. Blaya, 2019, Toward an understanding of the characteristics of secondary schoolcyberhate perpetrators, Frontiers in Education, 4, 46, 10.3389/feduc.2019.00046 · DOI
  7. Brechwald, 2011, Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 166, 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x · DOI
  8. Breckheimer, 2001, A haven for hate: The foreign and domestic implications of protecting Internet hate speech under the First Amendment, Southern California Law Review, 75, 1493
  9. Campbell, 2012, Victims’ perceptions of traditional and cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates of their victimisation, Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17, 389, 10.1080/13632752.2012.704316 · DOI
  10. Card, 2008, Peer victimization among schoolchildren: Correlations, causes, consequences, and considerations in assessment and intervention, School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 451, 10.1037/a0012769 · DOI
  11. Costello, 2019, We don’t like your type around here: regional and residential differences in exposure to online hate material targeting sexuality, Deviant Behavior, 40, 385, 10.1080/01639625.2018.1426266 · DOI
  12. Crick, 1994, A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment, Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74, 10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Cross, 2015, A social–ecological framework for understanding and reducing cyberbullying behaviours, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 109, 10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.016 · DOI
  14. Daniels, 2008, Race, civil rights, and hate speech in the digital era. pp. 129-154, 129
  15. Douglas, 2005, Understanding cyberhate: Social competition and social creativity in online White supremacist groups, Social Science Computer Review, 23, 68, 10.1177/0894439304271538 · DOI
  16. Dragowski, 2016, Educators‘ reports on incidence of harassment and advocacy LGBTQ students, Psychology in the Schools, 53, 127, 10.1002/pits.21895 · DOI
  17. ElSherief, M., Nilizadeh, S., Nguyen, D., Vigna, G., & Belding, E. (2018). Peer to peer hate: Hate speech instigators and their targets. Presented to the 12th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. · DOI
  18. Endrikat, 2011, Wie integriert sind Schülerinnen und Schüler mit und ohne Schulabschluss? Soziale Desintegrationsbelastungen und deren mögliche Folgen, Empirische Sonderpädagogik, 2, 162
  19. Erreygers, 2016, Helping behavior among adolescent bystanders of cyberbullying: The role of impulsivity, Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 61, 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.03.003 · DOI
  20. Garaigordobil, 2017, Stress, competence, and parental educational styles in victims and aggressors of bullying and cyberbullying, Psicothema, 29, 335, 10.7334/psicothema2016.258 · DOI
  21. Glick, 2012, Migration timing and parenting practices: Contributions to social development in preschoolers with foreign born and native born mothers, Child Development, 83, 1527, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01789.x · DOI
  22. Görzig, 2013, What makes a bully a cyberbully? Unravelling the characteristics of cyberbullies across twenty-five European countries, Journal of Children and Media, 7, 9, 10.1080/17482798.2012.739756 · DOI
  23. Hawdon, 2015, Online extremism and online hate: Exposure among adolescents and young adults in four nations, Nordicom Information: Medie-och kommunikationsforskning i Norden, 37, 29
  24. Hawdon, 2017, Exposure to online hate in four nations: A cross-national consideration, Deviant Behavior, 38, 254, 10.1080/01639625.2016.1196985 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hillard, 2012, They were only joking”: Efforts to decrease LGBTQ bullying and harassment in Seattle public schools, Journal of School Health, 84, 1, 10.1111/josh.12120 · DOI
  26. Jennings, 2012, On the overlap between victimization and offending: A review of the literature, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 16, 10.1016/j.avb.2011.09.003 · DOI
  27. Kowalski, 2014, Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth, Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073, 10.1037/a0035618 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Livingstone, 2011, EU kids online II: Final report 2011. (2015). Online extremism and online hate: Exposure among adolescents and young adults in four nations, Nordicom Information: Medie-och kommunikationsforskning i Norden, 37, 29
  29. Mesch, 2009, Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 387, 10.1089/cpb.2009.0068 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Mondal, M., Silva, L.A., & Benevenuto, F. (2017). A measurement study of hate speech in social media. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM conference on hypertext and social media (pp. 85–94). ACM. · DOI
  31. Näsi, 2015, Exposure to online hate material and social trust among Finnish youth, Information Technology & People, 28, 607, 10.1108/ITP-09-2014-0198 · DOI
  32. Pabian, 2016, Exposure to cyberbullying as a bystander: An investigation of desensitization effects among early adolescents, Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 480, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.022 · DOI
  33. Rivers, 2009, Observing bullying at school: The mental health implications of witness status, School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 211, 10.1037/a0018164 · DOI
  34. Smith, 2008, Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x · DOI · Paper page
  35. Smithyman, 2014, Long-term psychosocial consequences of peer victimization: From elementary to high school, School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 64, 10.1037/spq0000053 · DOI
  36. Staub, E. (2005). The origins and evolution of hate, with notes on prevention. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The psychology of hate (pp. 51–66). · DOI
  37. Suler, 2004, The online disinhibition effect, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 321, 10.1089/1094931041291295 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Thornberg, 2018, Victim prevalence in bullying and its association with teacher–student and student–student relationships and class moral disengagement: a class-level path analysis, Research Papers in Education, 33, 320, 10.1080/02671522.2017.1302499 · DOI
  39. Tsitsika, 2015, Cyberbullying victimization prevalence and associations with internalizing and externalizing problems among adolescents in six European countries, Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1, 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.048 · DOI
  40. Tynes, 2008, Online racial discrimination and psychological adjustment among adolescents, Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, 565, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.08.021 · DOI
  41. Tynes, 2004, Adolescence, race, and ethnicity on the Internet: A comparison of discourse in monitored vs. unmonitored chat rooms, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 667, 10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.003 · DOI
  42. Udris, 2014, Cyberbullying among high school students in Japan: Development and validation of the Online Disinhibition Scale, Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 253, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.036 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Vandebosch, 2009, Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims, New Media & Society, 11, 1349, 10.1177/1461444809341263 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Vazsonyi, 2012, Cyberbullying in context: Direct and indirect effects by low self-control across 25 European countries, European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 210, 10.1080/17405629.2011.644919 · DOI
  45. Voggeser, 2018, Self-control in online discussions: Disinhibited online behavior as a failure to recognize social cues, Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2372, 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02372 · DOI
  46. Wachs, 2019, The moderation of online disinhibition and sex on the relationship between online hate victimization and perpetration, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22, 300, 10.1089/cyber.2018.0551 · DOI
  47. Wachs, 2020, How do adolescents cope with cyberhate? Psychometric properties and socio-demographic differences of a coping with cyberhate scale, Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106167, 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106167 · DOI
  48. Wachs, 2015, Traditional, cyber and combined bullying roles: Differences in risky online and offline activities, Societies, 5, 109, 10.3390/soc5010109 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Wachs, S., Schubarth, W., & Bilz, L. (2020). hate speech als schulproblem? Erziehungswissenschaftliche Perspektiven auf ein aktuelles Phänomen. In I. van Ackeren, H. Bremer, F. Kessl, H. C. Koller, N. Pfaff, C. Rotter, D. Klein, & U. Salaschek (Hrsg.), Bewegungen – Beiträge aus dem 26. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft (S. 223–236). Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich. · DOI
  50. Wachs, 2012, Cybergrooming: Risk factors, coping strategies and associations with cyberbullying, Psicothema, 24, 628
  51. Wachs, 2019, Understanding the overlap between cyberbullying and cyberhate perpetration: Moderating effects of toxic online disinhibition, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 29, 179, 10.1002/cbm.2116 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Wachs, 2019, Associations between witnessing and perpetrating online hate in eight countries: the buffering effects of problem-focused coping, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 3992, 10.3390/ijerph16203992 · DOI
  53. Wagner, 2008, Prejudice and group-related behavior in Germany, Journal of Social Issues, 64, 403, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00568.x · DOI
  54. Wright, 2014, Predictors of anonymous cyber aggression: the role of adolescents’ beliefs about anonymity, aggression, and the permanency of digital content, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 431, 10.1089/cyber.2013.0457 · DOI
  55. Wright, 2013, The association between cyber victimization and subsequent cyber aggression: The moderating effect of peer rejection, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 662, 10.1007/s10964-012-9903-3 · DOI
  56. Wright, 2019, The associations between cyberbullying and callous-unemotional traits among adolescents: The moderating effect of online disinhibition, Personality and Individual Differences, 140, 41, 10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.001 · DOI
  57. Ybarra, 2011, National trends in exposure to and experiences of violence on the Internet among children, Pediatrics, 128, e1376, 10.1542/peds.2011-0118 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 17

Metadata

Authors
Bauman, S., Perry, V. M., & Wachs, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
ORCID
Venue
Child and Adolescent Online Risk Exposure
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2021
Pages
149-175
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-12-817499-9.00008-9
OpenAlex
W3113046443
Cited by
17
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
11.69
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
Keywords
cyberhate, online hate speech, children and adolescents, cyberbullying, freedom of expression, First Amendment, internet exposure, youth protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review